Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21379575›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

E. coli Nissle 1917 Affects Salmonella adhesion to porcine intestinal epithelial cells.

Peter Schierack, Sylvia Kleta, Karsten Tedin, Julius Tachu Babila, Sibylle Oswald, Tobias A Oelschlaeger, Rico Hiemann, Susanne Paetzold, Lothar H Wieler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advances inMaterials today. Bio · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. The Game for Three:Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Investigation of CommensalMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Insights from 100 Years of Research with ProbioticEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A transgenic probiotic secreting a parasite immunomodulator for site-directed treatment of gut inflammation.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Peter SchierackInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Tierseuchen, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Peter.Schierack@HS-Lausitz.de
Sylvia Kleta
Karsten Tedin
Julius Tachu Babila
Sibylle Oswald
Tobias A Oelschlaeger
Rico Hiemann
Susanne Paetzold
Lothar H Wieler
Freie Universität Berlin · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEInstitut für Tier-, Natur- und Umweltethik · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEResearch Center Borstel - Leibniz Lung Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe probiotic Escherichia coli strain Nissle 1917 (EcN) has been shown to interfere in a human in vitro model with the invasion of several bacterial pathogens into epithelial cells, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are not known. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsIn this study, we investigated the inhibitory effects of EcN on Salmonella Typhimurium invasion of porcine intestinal epithelial cells, focusing on EcN effects on the various stages of Salmonella infection including intracellular and extracellular Salmonella growth rates, virulence gene regulation, and adhesion. We show that EcN affects the initial Salmonella invasion steps by modulating Salmonella virulence gene regulation and Salmonella SiiE-mediated adhesion, but not extra- and intracellular Salmonella growth. However, the inhibitory activity of EcN against Salmonella invasion always correlated with EcN adhesion capacities. EcN mutants defective in the expression of F1C fimbriae and flagellae were less adherent and less inhibitory toward Salmonella invasion. Another E. coli strain expressing F1C fimbriae was also adherent to IPEC-J2 cells, and was similarly inhibitory against Salmonella invasion like EcN.

conclusionsWe propose that EcN affects Salmonella adhesion through secretory components. This mechanism appears to be common to many E. coli strains, with strong adherence being a prerequisite for an effective reduction of SiiE-mediated Salmonella adhesion.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionSwineAnimalsAntibiosisCells, CulturedEpithelial CellsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialIntestinal MucosaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSalmonella typhimuriumSpecies SpecificitySwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID21379575
PMCPMC3040738
OpenAlexW1989628849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.