Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21379339›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2011

The evolution of host specialization in the vertebrate gut symbiont Lactobacillus reuteri.

Steven A Frese, Andrew K Benson, Gerald W Tannock, Diane M Loach, Jaehyoung Kim, Min Zhang, Phaik Lyn Oh, Nicholas C K Heng, Prabhu B Patil, Nathalie Juge and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Revised complete genome sequences ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of Avian-DerivedAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Proposal ofInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Compatibility of toothpastes with probiotics for periodontal health: anFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic diversity and functional adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Steven A FreseDepartment of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Andrew K Benson
Gerald W Tannock
Diane M Loach
Jaehyoung Kim
Min Zhang
Phaik Lyn Oh
Nicholas C K Heng
Prabhu B Patil
Nathalie Juge
Donald A Mackenzie
Bruce M Pearson
Alla Lapidus
Eileen Dalin
Hope Tice
Eugene Goltsman
Miriam Land
Loren Hauser
Natalia Ivanova
Nikos C Kyrpides
Jens Walter

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/00044452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has provided mechanistic insight into the important contributions of the gut microbiota to vertebrate biology, but questions remain about the evolutionary processes that have shaped this symbiosis. In the present study, we showed in experiments with gnotobiotic mice that the evolution of Lactobacillus reuteri with rodents resulted in the emergence of host specialization. To identify genomic events marking adaptations to the murine host, we compared the genome of the rodent isolate L. reuteri 100-23 with that of the human isolate L. reuteri F275, and we identified hundreds of genes that were specific to each strain. In order to differentiate true host-specific genome content from strain-level differences, comparative genome hybridizations were performed to query 57 L. reuteri strains originating from six different vertebrate hosts in combination with genome sequence comparisons of nine strains encompassing five phylogenetic lineages of the species. This approach revealed that rodent strains, although showing a high degree of genomic plasticity, possessed a specific genome inventory that was rare or absent in strains from other vertebrate hosts. The distinct genome content of L. reuteri lineages reflected the niche characteristics in the gastrointestinal tracts of their respective hosts, and inactivation of seven out of eight representative rodent-specific genes in L. reuteri 100-23 resulted in impaired ecological performance in the gut of mice. The comparative genomic analyses suggested fundamentally different trends of genome evolution in rodent and human L. reuteri populations, with the former possessing a large and adaptable pan-genome while the latter being subjected to a process of reductive evolution. In conclusion, this study provided experimental evidence and a molecular basis for the evolution of host specificity in a vertebrate gut symbiont, and it identified genomic events that have shaped this process.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsGastrointestinal TractGenetic FitnessGenome, BacterialGenomicsHost SpecificityHumansLimosilactobacillus reuteriPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsRodentiaSpecies SpecificitySymbiosisVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID21379339
PMCPMC3040671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.