ArticlePLoS pathogens2011
Wolbachia infections in Anopheles gambiae cells: transcriptomic characterization of a novel host-symbiont interaction.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- The cellular lives of Wolbachia.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2023Review
- Ovarian transcriptional response to Wolbachia infection in D. melanogaster in the context of between-genotype variation in gene expression.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Differences in gene expression in field populations of Wolbachia-infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes with varying release histories in northern Australia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Article
- Investigating the microbial community of Cacopsylla spp. as potential factor in vector competence of phytoplasma.Environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Transposable element variants and their potential adaptive impact in urban populations of the malaria vectorGenome research · 2022Article
- Bioinformatic and cell-based tools for pooled CRISPR knockout screening in mosquitos.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Impacts of fungal entomopathogens on survival and immune responses of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens mosquitoes in the context of native Wolbachia infections.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Isolation in Natural Host Cell Lines ofInsects · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- A Role for Maternal Factors in Suppressing Cytoplasmic Incompatibility.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Dynamics of Insect-Microbiome Interaction Influence Host and Microbial Symbiont.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Review
- Selection on Aedes aegypti alters Wolbachia-mediated dengue virus blocking and fitness.Nature microbiology · 2019Article
- The effect of Wolbachia on gene expression in Drosophila paulistorum and its implications for symbiont-induced host speciation.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Wolbachia Population in Vectors and Non-vectors: A Sustainable Approach Towards Dengue Control.Current microbiology · 2019Article
- Symbiotic microbes affect the expression of male reproductive genes in Glossina m. morsitans.BMC microbiology · 2018Article
- Conflict in the Intracellular Lives of Endosymbionts and Viruses: A Mechanistic Look at Wolbachia-Mediated Pathogen-blocking.Viruses · 2018Review
- Proteomics ofPeerJ · 2018Article
- Comparative genomics identifies male accessory gland proteins in fiveWellcome open research · 2017Article
- 1.45 Å resolution structure of SRPN18 from the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia is being investigated as a potential control agent in several important vector insect species. Recent studies have shown that Wolbachia can protect the insect host against a wide variety of pathogens, resulting in reduced transmission of parasites and viruses. It has been proposed that compromised vector competence of Wolbachia-infected insects is due to up-regulation of the host innate immune system or metabolic competition. Anopheles mosquitoes, which transmit human malaria parasites, have never been found to harbor Wolbachia in nature. While transient somatic infections can be established in Anopheles, no stable artificially-transinfected Anopheles line has been developed despite numerous attempts. However, cultured Anopheles cells can be stably infected with multiple Wolbachia strains such as wAlbB from Aedes albopictus, wRi from Drosophila simulans and wMelPop from Drosophila melanogaster. Infected cell lines provide an amenable system to investigate Wolbachia-Anopheles interactions in the absence of an infected mosquito strain. We used Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays to investigate the effect of wAlbB and wRi infection on the transcriptome of cultured Anopheles Sua5B cells, and for a subset of genes used quantitative PCR to validate results in somatically-infected Anopheles mosquitoes. Wolbachia infection had a dramatic strain-specific effect on gene expression in this cell line, with almost 700 genes in total regulated representing a diverse array of functional classes. Very strikingly, infection resulted in a significant down-regulation of many immune, stress and detoxification-related transcripts. This is in stark contrast to the induction of immune genes observed in other insect hosts. We also identified genes that may be potentially involved in Wolbachia-induced reproductive and pathogenic phenotypes. Somatically-infected mosquitoes had similar responses to cultured cells. The data show that Wolbachia has a profound and unique effect on Anopheles gene expression in cultured cells, and has important implications for mechanistic understanding of Wolbachia-induced phenotypes and potential novel strategies to control malaria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.