Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21376743›Full record

ReviewMutation research2011

Choosing the right path: does DNA-PK help make the decision?

Jessica A Neal, Katheryn Meek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Influence of Edaphic Factors on DNA Damage and Repair in Wild WheatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Targeting DNA-PK.Cancer treatment and research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica A NealCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Katheryn Meek
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Relevant Targets of the DNA Dependent Protein KinaseR01AI048758 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MEEK, KATHERYN D · 2000 to 2016
$5.2M
NIAID NIH HHS AI048758NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI048758
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks are extremely harmful lesions that can lead to genomic instability and cell death if not properly repaired. There are at least three pathways that are responsible for repairing DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells: non-homologous end joining, homologous recombination and alternative non-homologous end joining. Here we review each of these three pathways with an emphasis on the role of the DNA-dependent protein kinase, a critical component of the non-homologous end joining pathway, in influencing which pathway is ultimately utilized for repair.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairAnimalsDNA-Activated Protein KinaseHumansLigasesModels, BiologicalPhosphorylationDNA-Activated Protein KinaseLigases

Identifiers

PMID21376743
PMCPMC3109507
OpenAlexW1992860902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.