Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21375717›Full record

ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2011

Natural products for cancer chemotherapy.

Arnold L Demain, Preeti Vaishnav

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 246 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
246citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

246 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Pyrone Glucoside fromBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the Anticancer Potential ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Hyptolide Promotes Breast Cancer Stem Cells Apoptosis and S-phase Cell Cycle Arrest.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

186 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arnold L DemainCharles A Dana Research Institute for Scientists Emeriti, Drew University, Madison, NJ 07940, USA. ademain@drew.edu
Preeti Vaishnav

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For over 40 years, natural products have served us well in combating cancer. The main sources of these successful compounds are microbes and plants from the terrestrial and marine environments. The microbes serve as a major source of natural products with anti-tumour activity. A number of these products were first discovered as antibiotics. Another major contribution comes from plant alkaloids, taxoids and podophyllotoxins. A vast array of biological metabolites can be obtained from the marine world, which can be used for effective cancer treatment. The search for novel drugs is still a priority goal for cancer therapy, due to the rapid development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. In addition, the high toxicity usually associated with some cancer chemotherapy drugs and their undesirable side-effects increase the demand for novel anti-tumour drugs active against untreatable tumours, with fewer side-effects and/or with greater therapeutic efficiency. This review points out those technologies needed to produce the anti-tumour compounds of the future.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiological ProductsDrug DiscoveryHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID21375717
PMCPMC3815406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.