Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21373969›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Temozolomide and 13-cis retinoic acid in patients with anaplastic gliomas: a prospective single-arm monocentric phase-II study (RNOP-05).

Oliver Grauer, Christina Pascher, Christian Hartmann, Florian Zeman, Michael Weller, Martin Proescholdt, Alexander Brawanski, Thorsten Pietsch, Wolfgang Wick, Ulrich Bogdahn and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Synchronous glioblastoma and medulloblastoma in a child with mismatch repair mutation.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2016
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Oliver GrauerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Regensburg, Universitätsstrasse 84, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Christina Pascher
Christian Hartmann
Florian Zeman
Michael Weller
Martin Proescholdt
Alexander Brawanski
Thorsten Pietsch
Wolfgang Wick
Ulrich Bogdahn
Peter Hau
University Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEHeidelberg University · DELife & Brain (Germany) · DENational Center for Tumor Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this prospective, monocentric phase-II pilot study was to evaluate toxicity and efficacy of neoadjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) and 13-cis retinoic acid (13-cRA) treatment in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas after total or subtotal tumor resection. The primary endpoint of the study was median progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were toxicity and PFS rates at 6, 12 and 24 months. Thirty-two adult patients were included in the study and treated with a median number of 10 TMZ and 13-cRA cycles (range 1-26). The majority of patients had favorable prognostic factors characterized by young age, complete resection, oligodendroglial histology, 1p/19q co-deletion, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation. Grade 3/4 myelotoxicity occurred in 5/32 patients, and about 90% of patients suffered from grade 2/3 adverse events attributable to 13-cRA. The median PFS was 37.8 months (95% CI 22.2-53.4). The 6-, 12- and 24-month PFS rates were 84.4, 75 and 42.4%. The extent of tumor resection was the only prognostic factor associated with better PFS. TMZ and 13-cRA treatment did not improve PFS when retrospectively compared to the TMZ-treated group within the randomized NOA-04 phase-III trial. In conclusion, 13-cRA addition to TMZ in a neoadjuvant setting showed acceptable toxicity, but did not yield an advantage in PFS in patients with newly diagnosed anaplastic gliomas after total or subtotal tumor resection.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalDiterpenesDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMale13-cis-retinalDacarbazineDiterpenesDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanRetinaldehydeTemozolomideTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21373969
OpenAlexW2003123373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.