Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21373823›Full record

SynthesisIntensive care medicine2011

The effect of etomidate on adrenal function in critical illness: a systematic review.

Stewart G Albert, Srividya Ariyan, Ayesha Rather

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Intensive care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. EtomidateWorld journal of clinical cases · 2021
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. The Pharmacology of Physiologically Difficult Airway Management and Impact on Hemodynamics: A Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nanotherapeutics for Alleviating Anesthesia-Associated Complications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stewart G AlbertDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 South Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. albertsg@slu.edu
Srividya Ariyan
Ayesha Rather
Saint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough etomidate is a preferred anesthetic agent for rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in critical illness, as an inhibitor of cortisol synthesis (11β-hydroxylase), it may be associated with adrenal dysfunction. The objectives are to review the effects of etomidate versus comparator anesthetics in critical illness for: primary outcome of mortality and secondary outcome of adrenal insufficiency (AI).

methodsStudies were extracted using MEDLINE and SCOPUS, regardless of language, between 1983 and 2010 using the keywords etomidate, intensive care units (ICU), critical illness, intensive care, glucocorticoids, and adrenal insufficiency. Studies of single dose etomidate versus comparator anesthetics with outcomes of adrenal function and/or mortality were included. All reviewers performed electronic data searches. One reviewer extracted data, which were checked by the other reviewers. Authors of trials were contacted for supplemental data. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality. AI was defined per article.

resultsTwo hundred sixty-three articles were screened, and 21 articles (19 independent data sets) were evaluated. Meta-analysis comparing etomidate versus non-etomidate anesthesia demonstrated an increased risk ratio (RR) for AI of 1.64 (range 1.52-1.77; 14 studies, 2,854 patients, P<0.0001, I(2)=88%) and an increased RR for mortality of 1.19 (1.10-1.30; 14 studies, 3,516 patients, P<0.0001, I(2)=64%). Significance of re-analysis for mortality within the subset of sepsis was maintained [RR 1.22 (1.11-1.35), 7 studies, n=1,767, I(2)=74%, P<0.0001], but not for trials without sepsis [RR=1.15 (0.97-1.35), 7 studies, n=1,749, I(2)=53%, P=0.10].

conclusionsThere is an increased rate of AI and mortality in critically ill patients who received etomidate.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdrenal GlandsAdrenal InsufficiencyEtomidateHumansHypnotics and SedativesIntensive Care UnitsEtomidateHypnotics and Sedatives

Identifiers

PMID21373823
OpenAlexW2115905293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.