Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21373200›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2011

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma--a systematic review.

Frank Peinemann, Nicolaus Kröger, Carmen Bartel, Ulrich Grouven, Max Pittler, Rudolf Erttmann, Michael Kulig

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. GEIS-SEHOP clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  4. Relapsed Rhabdomyosarcoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Evidence mapping based on systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions for soft tissue sarcomas.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the head and neck in children.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Frank PeinemannInstitute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany. frank.peinemann@iqwig.de
Nicolaus Kröger
Carmen Bartel
Ulrich Grouven
Max Pittler
Rudolf Erttmann
Michael Kulig
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care · DEGemeinsamer Bundesausschuss · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have a poor prognosis. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with metastatic RMS has additional benefit or harm compared to standard chemotherapy.

methodsSystematic literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. All databases were searched from inception to February 2010. PubMed was searched in June 2010 for a last update. In addition to randomized and non-randomized controlled trials, case series and case reports were included to complement results from scant data. The primary outcome was overall survival. A meta-analysis was performed using the hazard ratio as primary effect measure, which was estimated from Cox proportional hazard models or from summary statistics of Kaplan Meier product-limit estimations.

resultsA total of 40 studies with 287 transplant patients with metastatic RMS (age range 0 to 32 years) were included in the assessment. We identified 3 non-randomized controlled trials. The 3-year overall survival ranged from 22% to 53% in the transplant groups vs. 18% to 55% in the control groups. Meta-analysis on overall survival in controlled trials showed no difference between treatments. Result of meta-analysis of pooled individual survival data of case series and case reports, and results from uncontrolled studies with aggregate data were in the range of those from controlled data. The risk of bias was high in all studies due to methodological flaws.

conclusionsHDCT followed by autologous HSCT in patients with RMS remains an experimental treatment. At present, it does not appear justifiable to use this treatment except in appropriately designed controlled trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyDose-Response Relationship, DrugHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisRhabdomyosarcomaTransplantation, AutologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21373200
PMCPMC3044147
OpenAlexW1993620071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.