Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21373177›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Competition-based model of pheromone component ratio detection in the moth.

Andrei Zavada, Christopher L Buckley, Dominique Martinez, Jean-Pierre Rospars, Thomas Nowotny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Odor Stimuli: Not Just Chemical Identity.Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Synchronous firing of antennal-lobe projection neurons encodes the behaviorally effective ratio of sex-pheromone components in male Manduca sexta.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Interaction of cellular and network mechanisms for efficient pheromone coding in moths.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrei ZavadaInformatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Christopher L Buckley
Dominique Martinez
Jean-Pierre Rospars
Thomas Nowotny

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F005113/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For some moth species, especially those closely interrelated and sympatric, recognizing a specific pheromone component concentration ratio is essential for males to successfully locate conspecific females. We propose and determine the properties of a minimalist competition-based feed-forward neuronal model capable of detecting a certain ratio of pheromone components independently of overall concentration. This model represents an elementary recognition unit for the ratio of binary mixtures which we propose is entirely contained in the macroglomerular complex (MGC) of the male moth. A set of such units, along with projection neurons (PNs), can provide the input to higher brain centres. We found that (1) accuracy is mainly achieved by maintaining a certain ratio of connection strengths between olfactory receptor neurons (ORN) and local neurons (LN), much less by properties of the interconnections between the competing LNs proper. An exception to this rule is that it is beneficial if connections between generalist LNs (i.e. excited by either pheromone component) and specialist LNs (i.e. excited by one component only) have the same strength as the reciprocal specialist to generalist connections. (2) successful ratio recognition is achieved using latency-to-first-spike in the LN populations which, in contrast to expectations with a population rate code, leads to a broadening of responses for higher overall concentrations consistent with experimental observations. (3) when longer durations of the competition between LNs were observed it did not lead to higher recognition accuracy.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimal CommunicationAnimalsBrainFemaleMaleModels, BiologicalMothsNerve NetNeuronsOlfactory PathwaysOlfactory PerceptionOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPheromonesRecognition, PsychologySex AttractantsPheromonesSex Attractants

Identifiers

PMID21373177
PMCPMC3040183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.