Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21372841›Full record

SynthesisLeukemia2011

Meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing thiopurines in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

G Escherich, S Richards, L C Stork, A J Vora, Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Collaborative Group (CALLCG)

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Leukemia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02912676 (A Phase 1-2 Study of 6-Thioguanine in Combination With Methotrexate and 6-Mercaptopurine During Maintenance Therapy of Childhood, Adolescent, and Adult Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02912676 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Phase 1-2 Study of 6-Thioguanine in Combination With Methotrexate and 6-Mercaptopurine During Maintenance Therapy of Childhood, Adolescent, and Adult Lymphoblastic Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorKjeld SchmiegelowRan2016 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Lymphoblastic LymphomaArmsThioguanine (oral)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Progress Through Collaboration.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

G EscherichClinic of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
S Richards
L C Stork
A J Vora
Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia Collaborative Group (CALLCG)
Oregon Health & Science University · USSheffield Children's Hospital · GBUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council G0300130Medical Research Council G0901509Medical Research Council G0901509(92694)Medical Research Council MC_U137686856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercaptopurine has been used in continuing treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia since the mid 1950s. Recent advances in the understanding of thiopurine pharmacology indicated that thioguanine (TG) might be more effective than mercaptopurine (MP). The US and UK cooperative groups began randomised thiopurine trials and agreed prospectively to a meta-analysis. All randomised trials of TG versus MP were sought, and data on individual patients were analysed by standard methods. Combining three trials (from US, UK and Germany), the overall event-free survival (EFS) was not significantly improved with TG (odds ratio (OR)=0.89; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.03). Apparent differences in results between trials may be partly explained by the different types of patients studied. The larger treatment effect reported in males in the US trial was confirmed in the other trials. There was heterogeneity between sex/age subgroups (P=0.001), with significant EFS benefit of TG only observed for males aged <10 years old (OR=0.70; 0.58-0.84), although this did not result in a significant difference in overall survival (OR=0.83; 0.62-1.10). Additional toxicity occurs with TG. Mercaptopurine remains the standard thiopurine of choice, but further study of TG may be warranted to determine whether it could benefit particular subgroups.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticChildFemaleHumansMaleMercaptopurinePrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSex FactorsSurvival AnalysisThioguanineTreatment OutcomeAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticMercaptopurineThioguanine

Identifiers

PMID21372841
PMCPMC3112460
OpenAlexW2079689830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.