Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21372321›Full record

ReviewMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR2011

Change is good: variations in common biological mechanisms in the epsilonproteobacterial genera Campylobacter and Helicobacter.

Jeremy J Gilbreath, William L Cody, D Scott Merrell, David R Hendrixson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Virulence Traits of InpatientMicroorganisms · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Experimental Evolution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeremy J GilbreathDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
William L Cody
D Scott Merrell
David R Hendrixson
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · US

Funding

Flagellar Motor Biogenesis in Polarly-Flagellated Bacterial PathogensR01AI065539 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAVID R HENDRIXSON · 2006 to 2026
$9.2M
Regulatory Networks of Helicobacter pyloriR01AI065529 · NIAID · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI MERRELL, D. SCOTT · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
Regulatory Mechanisms of Helicobacter pyloriR56AI065529 · NIAID · HENRY M. JACKSON FDN FOR THE ADV MIL/MED · PI MERRELL, D. SCOTT · 2013 to 2013
$357k
NIAID NIH HHS AI065529NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI065529NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI065539NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI065529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial evolution and subsequent species diversification enable bacterial organisms to perform common biological processes by a variety of means. The epsilonproteobacteria are a diverse class of prokaryotes that thrive in diverse habitats. Many of these environmental niches are labeled as extreme, whereas other niches include various sites within human, animal, and insect hosts. Some epsilonproteobacteria, such as Campylobacter jejuni and Helicobacter pylori, are common pathogens of humans that inhabit specific regions of the gastrointestinal tract. As such, the biological processes of pathogenic Campylobacter and Helicobacter spp. are often modeled after those of common enteric pathogens such as Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli. While many exquisite biological mechanisms involving biochemical processes, genetic regulatory pathways, and pathogenesis of disease have been elucidated from studies of Salmonella spp. and E. coli, these paradigms often do not apply to the same processes in the epsilonproteobacteria. Instead, these bacteria often display extensive variation in common biological mechanisms relative to those of other prototypical bacteria. In this review, five biological processes of commonly studied model bacterial species are compared to those of the epsilonproteobacteria C. jejuni and H. pylori. Distinct differences in the processes of flagellar biosynthesis, DNA uptake and recombination, iron homeostasis, interaction with epithelial cells, and protein glycosylation are highlighted. Collectively, these studies support a broader view of the vast repertoire of biological mechanisms employed by bacteria and suggest that future studies of the epsilonproteobacteria will continue to provide novel and interesting information regarding prokaryotic cellular biology.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticCampylobacter jejuniDNA, BacterialEpithelial CellsFlagellaGastrointestinal TractGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGlycosylationHelicobacter pyloriHumansIronDNA, BacterialIron

Identifiers

PMID21372321
PMCPMC3063351
OpenAlexW1979349667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.