ArticleCancer research2011
Large-scale exploration of gene-gene interactions in prostate cancer using a multistage genome-wide association study.
Article in Cancer research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01221168 (ProGene), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ProGene: Etude Genetique et Epidemiologique du Cancer de la Prostate Familial
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale pleiotropic analysis across cancers reveals shared genetic mechanisms and identifies novel functional genes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Design and quality control of large-scale two-sample Mendelian randomization studies.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- A Large-Scale Genome-Wide Gene-Gene Interaction Study of Lung Cancer Susceptibility in Europeans With a Trans-Ethnic Validation in Asians.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2022Article
- Co-amplification of genes in chromosome 8q24: a robust prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Comprehensive Analysis of Germline Variants in Mexican Patients with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility.Cancers · 2018Article
- Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals a HIF Network and Hub Gene EPAS1 Associated with Lung Adenocarcinoma.EBioMedicine · 2018Article
- Dual tumor suppressing and promoting function of Notch1 signaling in human prostate cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Article
- Allele-specific imbalance mapping at human orthologs of mouse susceptibility to colon cancer (Scc) loci.International journal of cancer · 2015Article
- Article
- The A Allele at rs13419896 of EPAS1 Is Associated with Enhanced Expression and Poor Prognosis for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.PloS one · 2015Article
- Epithelial cancers in the post-genomic era: should we reconsider our lifestyle?Cancer metastasis reviews · 2013Review
- Atypical rearrangement involving 3'-IGH@ and a breakpoint at least 400 Kb upstream of an intact MYC in a CLL patient with an apparently balanced t(8;14)(q24.1;q32) and negative MYC expression.Molecular cytogenetics · 2013Article
- Lack of correlation between in silico projection of function and quantitative real-time PCR-determined gene expression levels in colon tissue.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2013Article
- Potential usefulness of single nucleotide polymorphisms to identify persons at high cancer risk: an evaluation of seven common cancers.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2012Article
- Invited commentary: more surprises from a gene desert.American journal of epidemiology · 2012Article
- A genome-wide search for loci interacting with known prostate cancer risk-associated genetic variants.Carcinogenesis · 2012Article
- Polymorphisms on 8q24 are associated with lung cancer risk and survival in Han Chinese.PloS one · 2012Article
- Next generation analytic tools for large scale genetic epidemiology studies of complex diseases.Genetic epidemiology · 2012Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recent genome-wide association studies have identified independent susceptibility loci for prostate cancer that could influence risk through interaction with other, possibly undetected, susceptibility loci. We explored evidence of interaction between pairs of 13 known susceptibility loci and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) across the genome to generate hypotheses about the functionality of prostate cancer susceptibility regions. We used data from Cancer Genetic Markers of Susceptibility: Stage I included 523,841 SNPs in 1,175 cases and 1,100 controls; Stage II included 27,383 SNPs in an additional 3,941 cases and 3,964 controls. Power calculations assessed the magnitude of interactions our study is likely to detect. Logistic regression was used with alternative methods that exploit constraints of gene-gene independence between unlinked loci to increase power. Our empirical evaluation demonstrated that an empirical Bayes (EB) technique is powerful and robust to possible violation of the independence assumption. Our EB analysis identified several noteworthy interacting SNP pairs, although none reached genome-wide significance. We highlight a Stage II interaction between the major prostate cancer susceptibility locus in the subregion of 8q24 that contains POU5F1B and an intronic SNP in the transcription factor EPAS1, which has potentially important functional implications for 8q24. Another noteworthy result involves interaction of a known prostate cancer susceptibility marker near the prostate protease genes KLK2 and KLK3 with an intronic SNP in PRXX2. Overall, the interactions we have identified merit follow-up study, particularly the EPAS1 interaction, which has implications not only in prostate cancer but also in other epithelial cancers that are associated with the 8q24 locus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.