Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21371993›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2011

Patient ability and willingness to participate in a web-based intervention to improve hypertension control.

Beverly B Green, Melissa L Anderson, James D Ralston, Sheryl Catz, Paul A Fishman, Andrea J Cook

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00158639 (Electronic Communications and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00158639 phase3completednot on this map

Electronic Communications and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2005 to 2007Enrolled778ConditionsHypertensionArmsHome BP, secure messaging, pharmaceutical care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Beverly B GreenGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA. green.b@ghc.org
Melissa L Anderson
James D Ralston
Sheryl Catz
Paul A Fishman
Andrea J Cook
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USGroup Health Cooperative · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Long-Term Outcomes and Costs of Web-Based Hypertension Care (e-BPLT)R01HL075263 · NHLBI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI GREEN, BEVERLY BETH · 2004 to 2012
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL075263NHLBI NIH HHS R01-HL075263
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-shared electronic health records provide opportunities for care outside of office visits. However, those who might benefit may be unable to or choose not to use these resources, while others might not need them.

objectiveElectronic Communications and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (e-BP) was a randomized trial that demonstrated that Web-based pharmacist care led to improved blood pressure (BP) control. During recruitment we attempted to contact all patients with hypertension from 10 clinics to determine whether they were eligible and willing to participate. We wanted to know whether particular subgroups, particularly those from vulnerable populations, were less willing to participate or unable to because they lacked computer access.

methodsFrom 2005 to 2006, we sent invitation letters to and attempted to recruit 9298 patients with hypertension. Eligibility to participate in the trial included access to a computer and the Internet, an email address, and uncontrolled BP (BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg). Generalized linear models within a modified Poisson regression framework were used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of ineligibility due to lack of computer access and of having uncontrolled BP.

resultsWe were able to contact 95.1% (8840/9298) of patients. Those refusing participation (3032/8840, 34.3%) were significantly more likely (P < .05) to be female, be nonwhite, have lower levels of education, and have Medicaid insurance. Among patients who answered survey questions, 22.8% (1673/7354) did not have computer access. Older age, minority race, and lower levels of education were risk factors for lack of computer access, with education as the strongest predictor (RR 2.63, 95% CI 2.30-3.01 for those with a high school degree compared to a college education). Among hypertensive patients with computer access who were willing to participate, African American race (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06-1.40), male sex (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.18-1.38), and obesity (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.31-1.79) were risk factors for uncontrolled BP.

conclusionOlder age, lower socioeconomic status, and lower levels of education were associated with decreased access to and willingness to participate in a Web-based intervention to improve hypertension control. Failure to ameliorate this may worsen health care disparities.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT00158639; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00158639 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5v1jnHaeo).

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryInternetPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanEducational StatusElectronic Health RecordsElectronic MailFemaleHumansHypertensionLinear ModelsMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID21371993
PMCPMC3217242
OpenAlexW2008637939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.