Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21371941›Full record

ArticleTrends in immunology2011

Regulating Il9 transcription in T helper cells.

Narayanan B Perumal, Mark H Kaplan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. GITRL enhances cytotoxicity and persistence of CAR-T cells in cancer therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Differentiation and regulation of CD4Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. CD4 T-Cell Subsets and the Pathophysiology of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Narayanan B PerumalSchool of Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Mark H Kaplan
Indiana University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

The role of PU.1 in T helper cell heterogeneityR01AI057459 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI KAPLAN, MARK H · 2005 to 2025
$8.2M
NIAID NIH HHS AI057459NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI057459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T helper (Th) cells are crucial for the development of immunity to infections and inflammatory disease. The acquisition of specific cytokine-secreting profiles, primed by the cytokine microenvironment, is required for effector function of Th cells. The most recent addition to the growing list of effector subsets are Th9 cells that secrete IL-9. In this review, we propose a model for the transcriptional regulation of the Il9 gene in IL-9-expressing T cells and the relatedness of this subset to other Th phenotypes. We suggest that transcription factors restricted to certain Th subsets and common among several subsets might play a role in the plasticity of Th9 cells.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageHumansInterleukin-9T-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerInterleukin-9

Identifiers

PMID21371941
PMCPMC3070825
OpenAlexW2089987068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.