Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21371308›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2011

Extracorporeal cell therapy of septic shock patients with donor granulocytes: a pilot study.

Jens Altrichter, Martin Sauer, Katharina Kaftan, Thomas Birken, Doris Gloger, Martin Gloger, Jörg Henschel, Heiko Hickstein, Ernst Klar, Sebastian Koball and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00818597 (PhaseI/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Granulocyte-Concentrates Applied in Extracorporeal Circulation Devices-the EISS-1 Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00818597 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

PhaseI/II Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of Granulocyte-Concentrates Applied in Extracorporeal Circulation Devices-the EISS-1 Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of RostockRan2003 to 2008Enrolled10ConditionsSevere Sepsis and Septic ShockArmsEISS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Purified Granulocyte Concentrates from Buffy Coats with Extended Storage Time.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2024
    Article
  5. Extracorporeal immune cell therapy of sepsis: ex vivo results.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2022
    Article
  6. CXCL5-mediated recruitment of neutrophils into the peritoneal cavity ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jens AltrichterDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical Faculty of University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, Rostock, D-18057, Germany.
Martin Sauer
Katharina Kaftan
Thomas Birken
Doris Gloger
Martin Gloger
Jörg Henschel
Heiko Hickstein
Ernst Klar
Sebastian Koball
Annette Pertschy
Gabriele Nöldge-Schomburg
Dierk A Vagts
Steffen R Mitzner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeutrophil granulocytes are the first defense line in bacterial infections. However, granulocytes are also responsible for severe local tissue impairment. In order to use donor granulocytes, but at the same time to avoid local side effects, we developed an extracorporeal immune support system. This first-in-man study investigated whether an extracorporeal plasma treatment with a granulocyte bioreactor is tolerable in patients with septic shock. A further intention was to find suitable efficacy end-points for subsequent controlled trials.

methodsThe trial was conducted as a prospective uncontrolled clinical phase I/II study with 28-day follow-up at three university hospital intensive care units. Ten consecutive patients (five men, five women, mean age 60.3 ± 13.9 standard deviation (SD) years) with septic shock with mean ICU entrance scores of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II of 29.9 ± 7.2 and of Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II of 66.2 ± 19.5 were treated twice within 72 hours for a mean of 342 ± 64 minutes/treatment with an extracorporeal bioreactor containing 1.41 ± 0.43 × 10E10 granulocytes from healthy donors. On average, 9.8 ± 2.3 liters separated plasma were treated by the therapeutic donor cells. Patients were followed up for 28 days.

resultsTolerance and technical safety during treatment, single organ functions pre/post treatment, and hospital survival were monitored. The extracorporeal treatments were well tolerated. During the treatments, the bacterial endotoxin concentration showed significant reduction. Furthermore, noradrenaline dosage could be significantly reduced while mean arterial pressure was stable. Also, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and human leukocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR) showed significant improvement. Four patients died in the hospital on days 6, 9, 18 and 40. Six patients could be discharged.

conclusionsThe extracorporeal treatment with donor granulocytes appeared to be well tolerated and showed promising efficacy results, encouraging further studies.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00818597.

Indexed as

AgedCritical CareFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGranulocytesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesShock, SepticTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21371308
PMCPMC3219336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.