Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21371296›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2011

Psychosocial impact of the summer 2007 floods in England.

Shantini Paranjothy, John Gallacher, Richard Amlôt, G James Rubin, Lisa Page, Tony Baxter, Jeremy Wight, David Kirrage, Rosemary McNaught, S R Palmer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of Extreme Weather Events on Mental Health: A Narrative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis for the UK.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Brain-Derived Neurotropic FactorBioMed research international · 2017
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Residential natural hazard risk and mental health effects.American journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Climate change and mental health: Position paper of the European Psychiatric Association.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shantini ParanjothyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
John Gallacher
Richard Amlôt
G James Rubin
Lisa Page
Tony Baxter
Jeremy Wight
David Kirrage
Rosemary McNaught
S R Palmer
Cardiff University · GBKing's College London · GBDoncaster Council · GBResponse Biomedical (Canada) · CASheffield City Council · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe summer of 2007 was the wettest in the UK since records began in 1914 and resulted in severe flooding in several regions. We carried out a health impact assessment using population-based surveys to assess the prevalence of and risk factors for the psychosocial consequences of this flooding in the United Kingdom.

methodsSurveys were conducted in two regions using postal, online, telephone questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. Exposure variables included the presence of flood water in the home, evacuation and disruption to essential services (incident management variables), perceived impact of the floods on finances, house values and perceived health concerns. Validated tools were used to assess psychosocial outcome (mental health symptoms): psychological distress (GHQ-12), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-9) and probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD checklist-shortform). Multivariable logistic regression was used to describe the association between water level in the home, psychological exposure variables and incident management variables, and each mental health symptom, adjusted for age, sex, presence of an existing medical condition, employment status, area and data collection method.

resultsThe prevalence of all mental health symptoms was two to five-fold higher among individuals affected by flood water in the home. People who perceived negative impact on finances were more likely to report psychological distress (OR 2.5, 1.8-3.4), probable anxiety (OR 1.8, 1.3-2.7) probable depression (OR 2.0, 1.3-2.9) and probable PTSD (OR 3.2, 2.0-5.2). Disruption to essential services increased adverse psychological outcomes by two to three-fold. Evacuation was associated with some increase in psychological distress but not significantly for the other three measures.

conclusionThe psychosocial and mental health impact of flooding is a growing public health concern and improved strategies for minimising disruption to essential services and financial worries need to be built in to emergency preparedness and response systems. Public Health Agencies should address the underlying predictors of adverse psychosocial and mental health when providing information and advice to people who are or are likely to be affected by flooding.

Indexed as

FloodsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyChecklistDepressionEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID21371296
PMCPMC3062606
OpenAlexW2065979440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.