ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2011
Data standards for Omics data: the basis of data sharing and reuse.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of 'omics' data: focus on human endometrium.Human reproduction updatePooled it
- Therapeutic strategies for MMAE-resistant bladder cancer through DPP4 inhibition.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Application ofFrontiers in toxicology · 2026Review
- LIMK1 is a prognosis and treatment biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bottlenecks in advancing and applying multiomic data integration-common data resources as rate-limiting drivers-the high-impact use case of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Overcoming borders: International cooperation in re-use and re-interpretation of omics data in Fontan circulation.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2025Article
- Guidance for sharing computational models of neural stimulation: from project planning to publication.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
- Evaluating the performance of multi-omics integration: a thyroid toxicity case study.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Reproductomics: Exploring the Applications and Advancements of Computational Tools.Physiological research · 2024Review
- Data Management in Biobanking: Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Review
- Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- FAIR Header Reference genome: a TRUSTworthy standard.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Standardizing digital biobanks: integrating imaging, genomic, and clinical data for precision medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Building a FAIR image data ecosystem for microscopy communities.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Review
- Ten quick tips for building FAIR workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- ChemFOnt: the chemical functional ontology resource.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Computational approaches in rheumatic diseases - Deciphering complex spatio-temporal cell interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Proteomic profiling of concurrently isolated primary microvascular endothelial cells, pericytes, and vascular smooth muscle cells from adult mouse heart.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To facilitate sharing of Omics data, many groups of scientists have been working to establish the relevant data standards. The main components of data sharing standards are experiment description standards, data exchange standards, terminology standards, and experiment execution standards. Here we provide a survey of existing and emerging standards that are intended to assist the free and open exchange of large-format data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.