Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21369847›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011

Surgical intensive care unit - essential for good outcome in major abdominal surgery?

Georg R Linke, Markus Mieth, Stefan Hofer, Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke, Jürgen Weitz, Eike Martin, Markus W Büchler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06268158 (The Effect of Eye Mask and Music on Sleep Quality and Delirium in Patients Monitored in Intensive Care Unit Following Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06268158 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Eye Mask and Music on Sleep Quality and Delirium in Patients Monitored in Intensive Care Unit Following Abdominal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorTC Erciyes UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsAbdominal SurgeryArmsEye patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Postoperative fluid management.World journal of critical care medicine · 2015
    Review
  7. Combined liver and multivisceral resections.HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery · 2014
    Review
  8. [Anesthesiology: partner or competitor?].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georg R LinkeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus Mieth
Stefan Hofer
Birgit Trierweiler-Hauke
Jürgen Weitz
Eike Martin
Markus W Büchler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical intensive care units (ICU) play a pivotal role in perioperative care of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Differences in quality of care provided by medical staff in ICUs may be linked to improved outcome. This review aims to elucidate the relationship between quality of care at various ICUs and patient outcome, with the ultimate aim of identifying key measures for achieving optimal outcome.

methodsWe reviewed the literature in PubMed to identify current ICU structural and process concepts and variations before evaluating their respective impact on quality of care and outcome in major abdominal surgery.

resultsICU leadership, nurse and physician staffing, and provision of an intermediate care unit are important structural components that impact on patients' outcome. A "mixed ICU" model, with intensivists primarily caring for the patients in close cooperation with the primary physician, seems to be the most effective ICU model. Surgeons' involvement in intensive care is essential, and a close cooperation between surgeons and anesthesiologists is vital for good outcome. Current general process concepts include early mobilization, enteral feeding, and optimal perioperative fluid management. To decrease failure-to-rescue rates, procedure-specific intensive care processes are particularly focused on the early detection, assessment, and timely and consistent treatment of complications.

conclusionsSeveral structures and processes in the ICU have an impact on outcome in major abdominal surgery. ICU structures and care processes connected with optimal outcome could be transmitted to other centers to improve outcome, independent of procedure volume.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAbdomenCritical CareHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.