Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21369814›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2011

Impact of a computer-generated alert system on the quality of tight glycemic control.

Geert Meyfroidt, Pieter Wouters, Wilfried De Becker, Dominiek Cottem, Greet Van den Berghe

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Association between e-alert implementation for detection of acute kidney injury and outcomes: a systematic review.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Nutrition Informatics Applications in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Intensive insulin therapy to maintain normoglycemia after cardiac surgery.HSR proceedings in intensive care & cardiovascular anesthesia · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geert MeyfroidtDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. geert.meyfroidt@uzleuven.be
Pieter Wouters
Wilfried De Becker
Dominiek Cottem
Greet Van den Berghe
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the impact of a computer-generated blood glucose (BG) alert, generated by a Patient Data Management System (PDMS) and superimposed on a paper-based guideline, on tight glycemic control (TGC) in the intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsTGC in the Leuven University Hospitals is performed by nurses using a paper-based guideline that allows anticipative, intuitive decision-making. An electronic alert was implemented on 1 August 2007 in which a pop-up appears in the PDMS at the following BG thresholds: >180, >110, 60-80, 40-60 and <40 mg/dl. The impact of this electronic alert was assessed by a sequential cohort study: the mean BG, the glycemic penalty index (GPI), the hyperglycemic index (HGI), the number of hypoglycemic events, the standard deviation (SD) of the BG time series and the number of BG measurements were compared in all adults admitted 6 months before ('pre-alert group', n = 729) and after ('alert group', n = 644) the implementation of the electronic alert.

resultsThe alert resulted in a reduction of mean BG (112 vs. 110 mg/dl, p = 0.002), GPI (20 vs. 19, p = 0.029) and HGI (10 vs. 9 mg/dl, p = 0.004), without increasing BG sampling (median 25 measurements/patient in both groups, p = 0.776). The alert reduced the proportion of patients experiencing an episode of hypoglycemia from 6.5 to 4.0% (p = 0.043). The SD of the BG time series was not affected (28 mg/dl in both groups, p = 0.566).

conclusionA computer-generated alert was able to statistically significantly improve the quality of TGC in ICU patients without increasing the need for blood sampling.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessIntensive Care UnitsReminder SystemsAgedBlood GlucoseChi-Square DistributionDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleGlycemic IndexHospital MortalityHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInfusion PumpsLength of StayMaleBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID21369814
OpenAlexW2070562264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.