Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21369791›Full record

SynthesisOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2012

Alendronate and atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.

E Barrett-Connor, A S Swern, C M Hustad, H G Bone, U A Liberman, S Papapoulos, H Wang, A de Papp, A C Santora

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

E Barrett-ConnorUniversity of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. ebarrettconnor@ucsd.edu
A S Swern
C M Hustad
H G Bone
U A Liberman
S Papapoulos
H Wang
A de Papp
A C Santora
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIn this meta-analysis of all Merck-conducted, placebo-controlled clinical trials of alendronate, the occurrence of AF was uncommon, with most studies reporting two or fewer events. Across all studies, no clear association between overall bisphosphonate exposure and the rate of serious or non-serious AF was observed.

introductionTo explore the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and other cardiovascular endpoints in clinical trials of alendronate.

methodsAll double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of alendronate 5, 10, or 20 mg daily, 35 mg once-weekly, 35 mg twice-weekly, and 70 mg once-weekly of at least 3 months duration conducted by Merck were included in this meta-analysis. The primary method of analysis was exact Poisson regression. Estimated relative risk (RR) of alendronate versus placebo and the associated 95% confidence interval was derived from a model that included number of episodes with factors for treatment group and study and an offset parameter for number of person-years on study.

resultsOf 41 studies considered, 32 met all criteria for inclusion in the analysis (participants-9,518 alendronate, 7,773 placebo). Estimated RR for all AF events was 1.16 (95% CI = 0.87, 1.55; p = 0.33). Most trials had two or fewer AF events. The RR of AF classified as a serious adverse event was 1.25 (95% CI = 0.82, 1.93; p = 0.33), but became 0.97 (95% CI = 0.51, 1.85) when the clinical fracture cohort of the Fracture Intervention Trial was excluded, indicating that results were driven by events in that study. Estimated RRs for other cardiovascular endpoints were less than 1.

conclusionsThe incidence of atrial fibrillation was low in Merck clinical trials of alendronate and was not significantly increased in any single trial nor in the meta-analysis. Based on this analysis, alendronate use does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation.

Indexed as

AlendronateAtrial FibrillationBone Density Conservation AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansIncidenceOsteoporosisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAlendronateBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID21369791
PMCPMC3249176
OpenAlexW2069920483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.