ReviewMycopathologia2011
A review molecular typing methods for Aspergillus flavus isolates.
Review in Mycopathologia, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular identification of aflatoxigenic Aspergillus species in feedstuff samples.Current medical mycology · 2018Article
- Investigating Clinical Issues by Genotyping of Medically Important Fungi: Why and How?Clinical microbiology reviews · 2017Review
- Genetic Diversity andAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017Article
- Microsatellite Typing of Aspergillus flavus Strains in a Tunisian Onco-hematology Unit.Mycopathologia · 2016Article
- The proportion of non-aflatoxigenic strains of the Aspergillus flavus/oryzae complex from meju by analyses of the aflatoxin biosynthetic genes.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2013Article
- Simple and highly discriminatory VNTR-based multiplex PCR for tracing sources of Aspergillus flavus isolates.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aspergillus flavus is the second most important Aspergillus species causing human infections. The importance of this fungus increases in regions with a dry and hot climate. Small phylogenetic studies in Aspergillus flavus indicate that the morphological species contains several genetically isolated species. Different genotyping methods have been developed and employed in order to better understand the genetic and epidemiological relationships between environmental and clinical isolates. Understanding pathogen distribution and relatedness is essential for determining the epidemiology of nosocomial infections and aiding in the design of rational pathogen control methods. Typing techniques can also give us a deeper understanding of the colonization pattern in patients. Most of these studies focused on Aspergillus fumigatus because it is medically the most isolated species. To date, there has not been any publication exclusively reviewing the molecular typing techniques for Aspergillus flavus in the literature. This article reviews all these different available methods for this organism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.