ArticleSkeletal radiology2012
Atypical diaphyseal femoral fractures--new aspects.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reliability and diagnostic utility of radiographs in patients with incomplete atypical femoral fractures.Skeletal radiology · 2019Article
- Management of Subtrochanteric Proximal Femur Fractures: A Review of Recent Literature.Advances in orthopedics · 2018Review
- VALIDATION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT BY BONE SCINTIGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH BONE-ONLY METASTATIC BREAST CANCERS DURING ZOLEDRONIC ACID TREATMENT: COMPARISON WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ASSESSMENT.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2015Article
- Current perspectives on bisphosphonate treatment in Paget's disease of bone.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2014Review
- Bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of their contribution and controversies.Skeletal radiology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post menopausal osteoporotic fractures are a major public health concern worldwide with oral bisphosphonates favored for their prevention and treatment. Recent interest has centered on clinically observed, unusually sited femoral diaphyseal fractures, particularly attributed to alendronate. Their imaging presentations on routine radiographs, alternate imaging modalities, and associated pitfalls in nine fractures in six patients are selectively illustrated by seven fractures in four patients that serve to emphasize the following: (1) Bisphosphonates other than alendronate have been used for treating various bone diseases in children and men as well as osteoporotic women. (2) Effects may differ with each bisphosphonate's route of administration and prolongation of activity, despite discontinuation. Prior investigations and theoretical mechanisms of bisphosphonates as a class rather than with a specific alendronate association are reviewed to provide a broader basis for evaluating their recently observed clinical and radiographic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.