Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21369365›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2011

Intersegmental coordination of cockroach locomotion: adaptive control of centrally coupled pattern generator circuits.

Einat Fuchs, Philip Holmes, Tim Kiemel, Amir Ayali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Existence of a Long-Range Caudo-Rostral Sensory Influence in Terrestrial Locomotion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Kinematic patterns while walking on a slope at different speeds.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sensory feedback in cockroach locomotion: current knowledge and open questions.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2015
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Einat FuchsDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University Princeton, NJ, USA.
Philip Holmes
Tim Kiemel
Amir Ayali

Funding

Role of conflict in memoryP50MH062196 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, JONATHAN D · 2000 to 2009
$18.9M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH062196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals' ability to demonstrate both stereotyped and adaptive locomotor behavior is largely dependent on the interplay between centrally generated motor patterns and the sensory inputs that shape them. We utilized a combined experimental and theoretical approach to investigate the relative importance of CPG interconnections vs. intersegmental afferents in the cockroach: an animal that is renowned for rapid and stable locomotion. We simultaneously recorded coxal levator and depressor motor neurons (MN) in the thoracic ganglia of Periplaneta americana, while sensory feedback was completely blocked or allowed only from one intact stepping leg. In the absence of sensory feedback, we observed a coordination pattern with consistent phase relationship that shares similarities with a double-tripod gait, suggesting central, feedforward control. This intersegmental coordination pattern was then reinforced in the presence of sensory feedback from a single stepping leg. Specifically, we report on transient stabilization of phase differences between activity recorded in the middle and hind thoracic MN following individual front-leg steps, suggesting a role for afferent phasic information in the coordination of motor circuits at the different hemiganglia. Data were further analyzed using stochastic models of coupled oscillators and maximum likelihood techniques to estimate underlying physiological parameters, such as uncoupled endogenous frequencies of hemisegmental oscillators and coupling strengths and directions. We found that descending ipsilateral coupling is stronger than ascending coupling, while left-right coupling in both the meso- and meta-thoracic ganglia appear to be symmetrical. We discuss these results in comparison with recent findings in stick insects that share similar neural and body architectures, and argue that the two species may exemplify opposite extremes of a fast-slow locomotion continuum, mediated through different intersegment coordination strategies.

Indexed as

central pattern generatorcockroachintersegmental coordinationlocomotionmaximum likelihood estimationrostral–caudal asymmetry

Identifiers

PMID21369365
PMCPMC3043608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.