Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21367990›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Characterization of an F1 deletion mutant of Yersinia pestis CO92, pathogenic role of F1 antigen in bubonic and pneumonic plague, and evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of F1 antigen capture-based dipsticks.

Jian Sha, Janice J Endsley, Michelle L Kirtley, Sheri M Foltz, Matthew B Huante, Tatiana E Erova, Elena V Kozlova, Vsevolod L Popov, Linsey A Yeager, Irina V Zudina and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Zoonoses (Shannon, Ireland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Complete Protection AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Plague vaccines: new developments in an ongoing search.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Development of Anti-ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Identification of New Virulence Factors and Vaccine Candidates forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jian ShaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-1070, USA.
Janice J Endsley
Michelle L Kirtley
Sheri M Foltz
Matthew B Huante
Tatiana E Erova
Elena V Kozlova
Vsevolod L Popov
Linsey A Yeager
Irina V Zudina
Vladimir L Motin
Johnny W Peterson
Kristin L DeBord
Ashok K Chopra

Funding

Identification of New Antigens for a Plague VaccineR01AI064389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI CHOPRA, ASHOK K · 2005 to 2015
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS AI064389NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI040097NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated two commercial F1 antigen capture-based immunochromatographic dipsticks, Yersinia Pestis (F1) Smart II and Plague BioThreat Alert test strips, in detecting plague bacilli by using whole-blood samples from mice experimentally infected with Yersinia pestis CO92. To assess the specificities of these dipsticks, an in-frame F1-deficient mutant of CO92 (Δcaf) was generated by homologous recombination and used as a negative control. Based on genetic, antigenic/immunologic, and electron microscopic analyses, the Δcaf mutant was devoid of a capsule. The growth rate of the Δcaf mutant generally was similar to that of the wild-type (WT) bacterium at both 26 and 37 °C, although the mutant's growth dropped slightly during the late phase at 37 °C. The Δcaf mutant was as virulent as WT CO92 in the pneumonic plague mouse model; however, it was attenuated in developing bubonic plague. Both dipsticks had similar sensitivities, requiring a minimum of 0.5 μg/ml of purified F1 antigen or 1 × 10(5) to 5 × 10(5) CFU/ml of WT CO92 for positive results, while the blood samples were negative for up to 1 × 10(8) CFU/ml of the Δcaf mutant. Our studies demonstrated the diagnostic potential of two plague dipsticks in detecting capsular-positive strains of Y. pestis in bubonic and pneumonic plague.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionAnimalsBacterial ProteinsClinical Laboratory TechniquesDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImmunoassayMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlagueReagent Kits, DiagnosticSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisVirulenceVirulence FactorsYersinia pestisBacterial Proteinscaf1 protein, Yersinia pestisReagent Kits, DiagnosticVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID21367990
PMCPMC3122665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.