Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21367988›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Multicenter, prospective clinical evaluation of respiratory samples from subjects at risk for Pneumocystis jirovecii infection by use of a commercial real-time PCR assay.

Philippe M Hauser, Jacques Bille, Cornelia Lass-Flörl, Christian Geltner, Marta Feldmesser, Michael Levi, Hitesh Patel, Victoria Muggia, Barbara Alexander, Martin Hughes and 7 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of the ELITe InGenius PCR assay compared with immunofluorescence for Pneumocystis jirovecii detection in respiratory samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Diagnosis ofInfection & chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  4. Current fungal infection reports · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Usefulness of ß-d-Glucan Assay for the First-Line Diagnosis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of Advanced HIV Disease.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  15. Comparative Evaluation Between the RealStarAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Rapid diagnostic test for respiratory infections].Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Philippe M HauserCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jacques Bille
Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Christian Geltner
Marta Feldmesser
Michael Levi
Hitesh Patel
Victoria Muggia
Barbara Alexander
Martin Hughes
Sarah A Follett
Xiaohui Cui
Flora Leung
Gillian Morgan
Adrian Moody
David S Perlin
David W Denning

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is a common opportunistic infection. Microscopic diagnosis, including diagnosis using the Merifluor-Pneumocystis direct fluorescent antigen (MP-DFA) test, has limitations. Real-time PCR may assist in diagnosis, but no commercially validated real-time PCR assay has been available to date. MycAssay Pneumocystis is a commercial assay that targets the P. jirovecii mitochondrial large subunit (analytical detection limit, ≤ 3.5 copies/μl of sample). A multicenter trial recruited 110 subjects: 54 with transplants (40 with lung transplants), 32 with nonmalignant conditions, 13 with leukemia, and 11 with solid tumors; 9 were HIV positive. A total of 110 respiratory samples (92% of which were bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] specimens) were analyzed by PCR. Performance was characterized relative to investigator-determined clinical diagnosis of PCP (including local diagnostic tests), and PCR results were compared with MP-DFA test results for 83 subjects. Thirteen of 14 subjects with PCP and 9/96 without PCP (including 5 undergoing BAL surveillance after lung transplantation) had positive PCR results; sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were 93%, 91%, 59%, and 99%, respectively. Fourteen of 83 subjects for whom PCR and MP-DFA test results were available had PCP; PCR sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 93%, 90%, 65%, and 98%, respectively, and MP-DFA test sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 93%, 100%, 100%, and 98%. Of the 9 PCR-positive subjects without PCP, 1 later developed PCP. The PCR diagnostic assay compares well with clinical diagnosis using nonmolecular methods. Additional positive results compared with the MP-DFA test may reflect low-level infection or colonization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansImmunocompromised HostMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMycologyPneumocystis cariniiPneumonia, PneumocystisPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID21367988
PMCPMC3122670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.