Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21366810›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2012

Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of women's experiences and expectations of participation.

Vicki Tsianakas, Karl Atkin, Michael W Calnan, Elizabeth Dormandy, Theresa M Marteau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of GPs' experiences.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preferences for prenatal diagnosis of sickle-cell disorder: A discrete choice experiment comparing potential service users and health-care providers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The implications of patients and carers as active agents in health care and the consequences for their own health, the health of their families and health system.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vicki TsianakasSchool of Nursing, King's College London, London, UK.
Karl Atkin
Michael W Calnan
Elizabeth Dormandy
Theresa M Marteau
King's College London · GBUniversity of Kent · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health 03 ⁄ 02 ⁄ 03Department of Health 03/02/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the acceptability to women of being offered antenatal Sickle cell and Thalassaemia (SC&T) screening in primary and secondary care at the visit to confirm pregnancy; and to explore the implications of their views for participating in decisions about their health care.

methodsQualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-one ethnically diverse women registered at twenty-five general practices in two English inner-city Primary Care Trusts. The material was analysed thematically, using the method of constant comparison.

resultsWomen generally welcomed the opportunity of early diagnosis, although they expected screening to confirm they were carrying a healthy child. Women felt general practitioners did not present antenatal screening as a choice, but they did not necessarily see this as a problem. Doctors were believed to be acting out of concern for the women's well being.

conclusionsWomen were generally positive about being offered screening in primary care at the first visit to confirm pregnancy. To this extent it was acceptable to them, although this was largely informed by assumptions associated with being a 'good mother' rather than a straightforward enactment of informed choice, assumed by health-care policy. This represents the context in which women participate in decisions about their health care.

Indexed as

AdultAnemia, Sickle CellEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisPrimary Health CareThalassemia

Identifiers

PMID21366810
PMCPMC5060612
OpenAlexW1937991745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.