Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21366528›Full record

ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2011

Tumor physiology and charge dynamics of anticancer drugs: implications for camptothecin-based drug development.

D J Adams, L R Morgan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Spheroids and organoids derived from colorectal cancer as tools forExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. DNA topoisomerase-targeting chemotherapeutics: what's new?Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Targeting ion transport in cancer.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer nanomedicines targeting tumor extracellular pH.Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces · 2012
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D J AdamsDUMC 2638, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Room 303 Medical Sciences Research Building 1, Duke University Medical Center, Research Drive, Durham, NC 27710, USA. adams041@mc.duke.edu
L R Morgan
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Camptothecin Analogs for Cancer TherapyR44CA125871 · NCI · DEKK-TEC, INC. · PI MORGAN, LEE ROY · 2010 to 2011
$837k
NCI NIH HHS 2R44CA125871-02NCI NIH HHS R44 CA125871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Charge is an important characteristic of drug molecules, since ionization sites determine the pKa at a particular pH. The pKa in turn can affect many parameters, including solubility, dissolution rate, reaction kinetics, formulation, cell permeability, tissue distribution, renal elimination, metabolism, protein binding and receptor interactions. The impact of charge dynamics is amplified in human solid tumors that exhibit the glycolytic phenotype and associated acidic extracellular microenvironment. This phenotype is driven by hypoxia and creates a pH gradient in tumors that favors uptake of weak acids and exclusion of weak bases. Established anticancer drugs exhibit a range of pKa's and thus variable ability to exploit the tumor pH gradient. The camptothecins are a prime example as they represent a diverse class of approved anticancer drugs and drug candidates whose charge distribution varies with pH. An in silico method was used to predict charge distribution of camptothecins at physiological versus acidic pH in both the lactone and carboxylate forms. A significant amount of uncharged carboxylate was predicted at acidic pH that could enter tumor cells and accumulate in mitochondria to inhibit mitochondrial topoisomerase I. A model is presented to describe the charge dynamics of a new camptothecin analog and the impact on nuclear and mitochondrial mechanism(s) of action. This example illustrates the importance of integrating tumor physiology and charge dynamics into anticancer drug development.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinDNA Topoisomerases, Type IHumansKineticsNeoplasmsTopoisomerase I InhibitorsAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinDNA Topoisomerases, Type ITopoisomerase I Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21366528
PMCPMC3086837
OpenAlexW2032513273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.