ArticleSurgery today2011
Impact of prior abdominal surgery on curative resection of colon cancer via minilaparotomy.
Article in Surgery today, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Updates in surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023Article
- Prior Abdominal Surgery Jeopardizes Quality of Resection in Colorectal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2016Article
- Comparison between transverse mini-incision and longitudinal mini-incision for the resection of locally advanced colonic cancer.International surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the impact of prior abdominal surgery on curative resection of colon cancer via a minilaparotomy approach.
methodsFeasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes were evaluated retrospectively in 263 patients scheduled to undergo curative resection of colon cancer via a minilaparotomy approach, defined as a skin incision of ≤ 7 cm, between September 2000 and March 2009.
resultsAbdominal adhesions were found in 59 (77.6%) of 76 patients who had undergone prior abdominal surgery (PAS group) and in 4 (2.1%) of 187 patients who had not (control group). The success rate of the minilaparotomy approach was 92.1% in the PAS group and 97.3% in the control group (P = 0.08). The incidence of extending the minilaparotomy wound for adhesiolysis was significantly higher in the PAS group than in the control group (6.6% vs 0.5%; P < 0.01). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of the types of surgery, pathological stage, body mass index, operative time, blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and disease-free survival.
conclusionsThese results suggest that prior abdominal surgery might require an extension of the minilaparotomy incision but that it does not seem to contraindicate a minilaparotomy approach for curative colectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21365418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.