Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2011
Contasure-Needleless compared with transobturator-TVT for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- A randomized, nonblinded extension study of single-incision versus transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2018Trial
- A randomised comparison of single-incision versus traditional transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of a 24-month follow-up.International urogynecology journal · 2016Trial
- Contasure-Needleless® single incision sling compared with transobturator TVT-O® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: long-term results.International urogynecology journal · 2015Trial
- Review
- Contasure-needleless® compared with Monarc® for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.International urogynecology journal · 2017Article
- Stress urinary incontinence in women: Current and emerging therapeutic options.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2017Review
- Use of surgeon-tailored polypropylene mesh as a needle-less single-incision sling for treating female stress urinary incontinence: Preliminary results.Arab journal of urology · 2015Article
- Surgeon-tailored polypropylene mesh as a needleless single-incision sling versus TVT-O for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a comparative study.International urology and nephrology · 2015Article
- A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.International urogynecology journal · 2014Article
- Single-Incision Slings (SIS) - a New Option for the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSingle-incision devices for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have been introduced in the last few years. We report a comparison between Obturator Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT-O) and Contasure-Needleless (C-NDL).
methodsOne hundred and fifty-eight women with primary SUI were scheduled to receive TVT-O or C-NDL and follow-up during the first year. Epidemiological information, complications, blood loss, and pain level were recorded. We also analyze stress test and quality of life.
resultsSixty-three (87.5%) C-NDL presented a negative stress test, compared with 54 (90%) of TVT-O (p value 0.015 for non-inferiority test). Sandvik Severity Index was 0 in 75.4% in the C-NDL group and 87.3% in the TVT-O (p < 0.015). Complication rate and degree of satisfaction were similar in both groups. Statistically, there were differences (p = 0.012) in postoperative pain in the TVT-O group.
conclusionsC-NDL provides similar outcomes as TVT-O after 1-year follow-up. It is necessary that long-term data confirm our results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21365331What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.