ArticlePLoS medicine2011
Health behaviours, socioeconomic status, and mortality: further analyses of the British Whitehall II and the French GAZEL prospective cohorts.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 156 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
156 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 354 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health Risk Behaviours by Immigrants' Duration of Residence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of public health · 2022Pooled it
- Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women.Lancet (London, England) · 2017Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Scalable Telehealth Cancer Care: integrated healthy lifestyle program to live well after cancer treatment.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024Trial
- Socio-economic factors, mood, primary care utilization, and quality of life as predictors of intervention cessation and chronic stress in a type 2 diabetes prevention intervention (PREVIEW Study).BMC public health · 2023Trial
- Impact of proximity of healthier versus less healthy foods on intake: A lab-based experiment.Appetite · 2019Trial
- Effect of snack-food proximity on intake in general population samples with higher and lower cognitive resource.Appetite · 2018Trial
- Biological marks of early-life socioeconomic experience is detected in the adult inflammatory transcriptome.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Disruption of multisystem responses to stress in type 2 diabetes: investigating the dynamics of allostatic load.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Trial
- Using web-based familial risk information for diabetes prevention: a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2013Trial
- Social inequalities and mortality in Europe--results from a large multi-national cohort.PloS one · 2012Trial
- Socioeconomic inequalities and health behaviours in depression: a picture of mental health in Portugal.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Life-course socioeconomic circumstances and changes in leisure-time physical activity among young and early midlife employees.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- The effects of subjective socioeconomic status and its underestimation on physical activity: evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Influence of health empowerment on health outcomes of different socioeconomic status: evidence from Anhui, China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Stronger Together: a community-based intervention using Behaviour Change Wheel to promote healthier lifestyles among women with low socioeconomic status: a feasibility study.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Occupational status and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- [Understanding and changing social disparities in health behaviour: nutrition as an interface between social inequality and health].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Review
- US state death rates: Structural equation modeling of Big Five personality, socioeconomic status, and health risk factors.Journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- Self-medication and off-label prescribing in post COVID-19 syndrome: Baseline data of a randomized acupressure and qigong trial.Integrative medicine research · 2025Article
96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDifferences in morbidity and mortality between socioeconomic groups constitute one of the most consistent findings of epidemiologic research. However, research on social inequalities in health has yet to provide a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying this association. In recent analysis, we showed health behaviours, assessed longitudinally over the follow-up, to explain a major proportion of the association of socioeconomic status (SES) with mortality in the British Whitehall II study. However, whether health behaviours are equally important mediators of the SES-mortality association in different cultural settings remains unknown. In the present paper, we examine this issue in Whitehall II and another prospective European cohort, the French GAZEL study. METHODS AND
findingsWe included 9,771 participants from the Whitehall II study and 17,760 from the GAZEL study. Over the follow-up (mean 19.5 y in Whitehall II and 16.5 y in GAZEL), health behaviours (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, and physical activity), were assessed longitudinally. Occupation (in the main analysis), education, and income (supplementary analysis) were the markers of SES. The socioeconomic gradient in smoking was greater (p<0.001) in Whitehall II (odds ratio [OR] = 3.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.11-4.36) than in GAZEL (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.49); this was also true for unhealthy diet (OR = 7.42, 95% CI 5.19-10.60 in Whitehall II and OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.49 in GAZEL, p<0.001). Socioeconomic differences in mortality were similar in the two cohorts, a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% CI 1.28-2.05) in Whitehall II and 1.94 in GAZEL (95% CI 1.58-2.39) for lowest versus highest occupational position. Health behaviours attenuated the association of SES with mortality by 75% (95% CI 44%-149%) in Whitehall II but only by 19% (95% CI 13%-29%) in GAZEL. Analysis using education and income yielded similar results.
conclusionsHealth behaviours were strong predictors of mortality in both cohorts but their association with SES was remarkably different. Thus, health behaviours are likely to be major contributors of socioeconomic differences in health only in contexts with a marked social characterisation of health behaviours. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.