ArticlePloS one2011
Spider silk constructs enhance axonal regeneration and remyelination in long nerve defects in sheep.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluorescent Spider Silk: A Natural Phenomenon with Potential Applications.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Exploration of biomaterial and stem cell-based strategies for promoting neuronal regeneration and creating engineered 3D in-vitro disease models.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Bridging the Gap: Contemporary Paradigms in Nerve Scaffolds and Regeneration.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
- Impact of conduit-filling interactions on the efficacy of fiber and hydrogel fillers in nerve conduits.iScience · 2025Article
- Exploring the Unique Properties and Superior Schwann Cell Guiding Abilities of Spider Egg Sac Silk.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Article
- Biological conduits based on spider silk for reconstruction of extended nerve defects.Innovative surgical sciences · 2024Article
- Bacteria inhabiting spider webs enhance host silk extensibility.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Various Spider Silks in Regard to Nerve Regeneration: Material Properties and Schwann Cell Response.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Article
- Article
- Regenerative Strategies in Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injuries in Different Animal Models.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2023Review
- Review
- Factors Influencing Properties of Spider Silk Coatings and Their Interactions within a Biological Environment.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Silk-in-Silk Nerve Guidance Conduits Enhance Regeneration in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Injury Model.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Repair of Long Peripheral Nerve Defects in Sheep: A Translational Model for Nerve Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Repair of Long Nerve Defects with a New Decellularized Nerve Graft in Rats and in Sheep.Cells · 2022Article
- Repair of ovine peripheral nerve injuries with xenogeneic human acellular sciatic nerves prerecellularized with allogeneic Schwann-like cells-an innovative and promising approach.Regenerative therapy · 2022Article
- Review
- Implantable Biomaterials for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration-Technology Trends and Translational Tribulations.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Heterogeneity and Potency of Peripheral Glial Cells in Embryonic Development and Adults.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical reapposition of peripheral nerve results in some axonal regeneration and functional recovery, but the clinical outcome in long distance nerve defects is disappointing and research continues to utilize further interventional approaches to optimize functional recovery. We describe the use of nerve constructs consisting of decellularized vein grafts filled with spider silk fibers as a guiding material to bridge a 6.0 cm tibial nerve defect in adult sheep. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThe nerve constructs were compared to autologous nerve grafts. Regeneration was evaluated for clinical, electrophysiological and histological outcome. Electrophysiological recordings were obtained at 6 months and 10 months post surgery in each group. Ten months later, the nerves were removed and prepared for immunostaining, electrophysiological and electron microscopy. Immunostaining for sodium channel (NaV 1.6) was used to define nodes of Ranvier on regenerated axons in combination with anti-S100 and neurofilament. Anti-S100 was used to identify Schwann cells. Axons regenerated through the constructs and were myelinated indicating migration of Schwann cells into the constructs. Nodes of Ranvier between myelin segments were observed and identified by intense sodium channel (NaV 1.6) staining on the regenerated axons. There was no significant difference in electrophysiological results between control autologous experimental and construct implantation indicating that our construct are an effective alternative to autologous nerve transplantation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that spider silk enhances Schwann cell migration, axonal regrowth and remyelination including electrophysiological recovery in a long-distance peripheral nerve gap model resulting in functional recovery. This improvement in nerve regeneration could have significant clinical implications for reconstructive nerve surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.