Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21364900›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Ionic components of electric current at rat corneal wounds.

Ana Carolina Vieira, Brian Reid, Lin Cao, Mark J Mannis, Ivan R Schwab, Min Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Mechanisms of Electric Signals Generated at Corneal Wounds.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Electrical stimulation: a novel adjunct therapy for diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Wireless-Powered Electrical Bandage Contact Lens for Facilitating Corneal Wound Healing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A current affair: electrotherapy in wound healing.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Carolina VieiraDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Brian Reid
Lin Cao
Mark J Mannis
Ivan R Schwab
Min Zhao
University of California, Davis · USUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Molecular Generators at Corneal Wounds Produce and regulate the Wound Electrical SignalsR01EY019101 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ZHAO, MIN · 2010 to 2023
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS 1R01EY019101NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019101Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndogenous electric fields and currents occur naturally at wounds and are a strong signal guiding cell migration into the wound to promote healing. Many cells involved in wound healing respond to small physiological electric fields in vitro. It has long been assumed that wound electric fields are produced by passive ion leakage from damaged tissue. Could these fields be actively maintained and regulated as an active wound response? What are the molecular, ionic and cellular mechanisms underlying the wound electric currents? METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing rat cornea wounds as a model, we measured the dynamic timecourses of individual ion fluxes with ion-selective probes. We also examined chloride channel expression before and after wounding. After wounding, Ca(2+) efflux increased steadily whereas K(+) showed an initial large efflux which rapidly decreased. Surprisingly, Na(+) flux at wounds was inward. A most significant observation was a persistent large influx of Cl(-), which had a time course similar to the net wound electric currents we have measured previously. Fixation of the tissues abolished ion fluxes. Pharmacological agents which stimulate ion transport significantly increased flux of Cl(-), Na(+) and K(+). Injury to the cornea caused significant changes in distribution and expression of Cl(-) channel CLC2. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data suggest that the outward electric currents occurring naturally at corneal wounds are carried mainly by a large influx of chloride ions, and in part by effluxes of calcium and potassium ions. Ca(2+) and Cl(-) fluxes appear to be mainly actively regulated, while K(+) flux appears to be largely due to leakage. The dynamic changes of electric currents and specific ion fluxes after wounding suggest that electrical signaling is an active response to injury and offers potential novel approaches to modulate wound healing, for example eye-drops targeting ion transport to aid in the challenging management of non-healing corneal ulcers.

Indexed as

Corneal InjuriesElectric StimulationAnimalsCells, CulturedCorneaElectricityElectrophysiological PhenomenaIonsMaleModels, BiologicalOrgan Culture TechniquesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySignal TransductionWounds and InjuriesIons

Identifiers

PMID21364900
PMCPMC3045448
OpenAlexW2016914234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.