Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21364881›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Microdroplet-enabled highly parallel co-cultivation of microbial communities.

Jihyang Park, Alissa Kerner, Mark A Burns, Xiaoxia Nina Lin

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Habitat fragmentation enhances microbial collective defence.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  7. Microbial community interactions on a chip.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Learning beyond-pairwise interactions enables the bottom-up prediction of microbial community structure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Research progress in isolation and identification of rumen probiotics.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. [Application of Droplet-Based Microfluidics in Microbial Research].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jihyang ParkDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Alissa Kerner
Mark A Burns
Xiaoxia Nina Lin

Funding

Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (CBTP)T32GM008353 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SCHWENDEMAN, ANNA · 1991 to 2021
$9.3M
Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (CBTP) - Years 31-35T32GM145304 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Guizhi Zhu · 2022 to 2026
$2.6M
DNA Analysis in Multi-Phase Microfabricated DevicesR01EB006789 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BURNS, MARK A · 2008 to 2010
$978k
Metagenomic Dissection of the Gut MicrobiotaR21HG005077 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LIN, XIAOXIA · 2010 to 2012
$596k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1R21HG005077NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG005077NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB006789NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006789NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008353NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial interactions in natural microbiota are, in many cases, crucial for the sustenance of the communities, but the precise nature of these interactions remain largely unknown because of the inherent complexity and difficulties in laboratory cultivation. Conventional pure culture-oriented cultivation does not account for these interactions mediated by small molecules, which severely limits its utility in cultivating and studying "unculturable" microorganisms from synergistic communities. In this study, we developed a simple microfluidic device for highly parallel co-cultivation of symbiotic microbial communities and demonstrated its effectiveness in discovering synergistic interactions among microbes. Using aqueous micro-droplets dispersed in a continuous oil phase, the device could readily encapsulate and co-cultivate subsets of a community. A large number of droplets, up to ∼1,400 in a 10 mm × 5 mm chamber, were generated with a frequency of 500 droplets/sec. A synthetic model system consisting of cross-feeding E. coli mutants was used to mimic compositions of symbionts and other microbes in natural microbial communities. Our device was able to detect a pair-wise symbiotic relationship when one partner accounted for as low as 1% of the total population or each symbiont was about 3% of the artificial community.

Indexed as

BiotaCoculture TechniquesCulture MediaDrug CompoundingEscherichia coliMicrobial ConsortiaMicrobial InteractionsMicrobiological TechniquesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMiniaturizationModels, BiologicalOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedSymbiosisCulture Media

Identifiers

PMID21364881
PMCPMC3045426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.