Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21364875›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The incidence of type-1 diabetes in NOD mice is modulated by restricted flora not germ-free conditions.

Cecile King, Nora Sarvetnick

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03032354 (Effect of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium Lactis BB 12 on Beta-cell Function in Children With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes - a Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03032354 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium Lactis BB 12 on Beta-cell Function in Children With Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes - a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of WarsawRan2017 to 2018Enrolled96ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1ArmsLactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis BB12, Placebo, (Placebo group)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects ofBMJ open · 2017
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Biomolecular Actions by Intestinal Endotoxemia in Metabolic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Biomolecular Mechanisms of Autoimmune Diseases and Their Relationship with the Resident Microbiota: Friend or Foe?Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2022
    Review
  14. The Impact of Intestinal Microorganisms and Their Metabolites on Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Of mice and men and women: Sexual dimorphism of the gut microbiome.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. The gut microbiome of laboratory mice: considerations and best practices for translational research.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecile KingDepartment of Immunology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America. c.king@garvan.org.au
Nora Sarvetnick
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

COUNTER REGULATION IN TISSUESR01DK054063 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SARVETNICK, NORA E · 1998 to 2006
$2.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS NIH/DK54063NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the NOD mouse, the incidence of type-1 diabetes is thought to be influenced by the degree of cleanliness of the mouse colony. Studies collectively demonstrate that exposure to bacterial antigen or infection in the neonatal period prevents diabetes [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], supporting the notion that immunostimulation can benefit the maturation of the postnatal immune system [11]. A widely accepted extrapolation from this data has been the notion that NOD mice maintained under germ-free conditions have an increased incidence of diabetes. However, evidence supporting this influential concept is surprisingly limited [12]. In this study, we demonstrate that the incidence of diabetes in female NOD mice remained unchanged under germ-free conditions. By contrast, a spontaneous monoculture with a gram-positive aerobic spore-forming rod delayed the onset and reduced the incidence of diabetes. These findings challenge the view that germ-free NOD mice have increased diabetes incidence and demonstrate that modulation of intestinal microbiota can prevent the development of type-1 diabetes.

Indexed as

Germ-Free LifeAnimalsAnimals, NewbornDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGram-Positive Endospore-Forming BacteriaIncidenceIntestinesMetagenomeMiceMice, Inbred NOD

Identifiers

PMID21364875
PMCPMC3045412
OpenAlexW2051563029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.