ArticleBioinformation2010
Molecular evolution of the cecropin multigene family in silkworm Bombyx mori.
Article in Bioinformation, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design of Hybrid Bioactive Peptides Derived From Cecropin and Cathepsin for Therapeutic Application.Chemical biology & drug design · 2025Article
- A novel broad-spectrum antibacterial and anti-malarial Anopheles gambiae Cecropin promotes microbial clearance during pupation.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- Article
- Antimicrobial Peptides: An Update on Classifications and Databases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Activity of Anti-Microbial Peptides (AMPs) againstBiomolecules · 2021Review
- Insect Cecropins, Antimicrobial Peptides with Potential Therapeutic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Antimicrobial functional divergence of the cecropin antibacterial peptide gene family in Musca domestica.Parasites & vectors · 2019Article
- Intrinsic antimicrobial properties of silk spun by genetically modified silkworm strains.Transgenic research · 2018Article
- Involvement of cecropin B in the formation of the Aedes aegypti mosquito cuticle.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Differential sensitivity to infections and antimicrobial peptide-mediated immune response in four silkworm strains with different geographical origin.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Cecropins from Plutella xylostella and Their Interaction with Metarhizium anisopliae.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cecropins constitute one of the largest and most potent immune protein families found in insect species with diversified numbers and features. In view of the large number of cecropin proteins existing with much sequence variations among them, an overview of the multigene cecropin family in silkworm Bombyx mori was attempted in this study. Cecropin encodes an inducible 64 residue anti-bacterial peptide and was clustered into two groups; first group viz. A and second group including B, D, E and Enbocin. Cecropin A consisted of two sub-groups located on chromosome number 6 of B.mori genome. Cecropin B consisted of six sub-groups, cecropin D and E of one each and Enbocin of two. The second sub-group formed in tandem array of multigene family locus over a length of 78.62 kb on chromosome number 26 in B.mori genome and was organized in positive as well as opposite orientation. The results indicated that cecropin B genes were organized in a close cluster with the intergenic sequence ranging from 1366 bp to 23526 bp. Interestingly a distantly related cecropin E was also located within the cecropin B multigene locus. Similarly distant members like cecropin D and Enbocin were also located in the 3' region of cecropin B locus. The maximum intergenic region of 23526 bp observed between Cecropin D and Enbocin indicates that the two genes were distantly evolved. The phylogenetic analysis clearly indicates a positive correlation between the clusters and physical location on the chromosome, as the length of the intergenic region plays a major role to create newer cecropin families. EST database analysis suggests that most of the cecropin A members were expressed in the microbial fat body while, the cecropin B was equally expressed in fat body and other target tissues. The signal peptides were conserved in all the twelve paralogous gene sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.