ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2011
Methodological and practical challenges for personalized cancer therapies.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Baseline immune biomarkers as predictors of MBSR(BC) treatment success in off-treatment breast cancer patients.Biological research for nursing · 2014Trial
- Early prediction of therapy responses and outcomes in breast cancer patients using quantitative ultrasound spectral texture.Oncotarget · 2014Trial
- System-level clustering of testosterone-related biomarkers identifies high-risk aging profiles linked to inflammation and renal function.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Innovative immunotherapy approaches: harnessing synergy of dual checkpoint blockade in oncology.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiome and bile acid metabolism in liver disease: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Let's make it personal: CRISPR tools in manipulating cell death pathways for cancer treatment.Cell biology and toxicology · 2024Review
- Microfluidic Organoid Cultures Derived from Pancreatic Cancer Biopsies for Personalized Testing of Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- A pooled analysis of clinical outcome in driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer patients with MET overexpression treated with gumarontinib.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2024Article
- Biosynthetic Melanin/Ce6-Based Photothermal and Sonodynamic Therapies Significantly Improved the Anti-Tumor Efficacy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Metformin inhibits human non-small cell lung cancer by regulating AMPK-CEBPB-PDL1 signaling pathway.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022Article
- Immune-related gene signature associates with immune landscape and predicts prognosis accurately in patients with Wilms tumour.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- A plasmon-enhanced theranostic nanoplatform for synergistic chemo-phototherapy of hypoxic tumors in the NIR-II window.Chemical science · 2021Article
- Nanomaterials and their composite scaffolds for photothermal therapy and tissue engineering applications.Science and technology of advanced materials · 2021Article
- Time dependent effect of cold ischemia on the phosphoproteome and protein kinase activity in fresh-frozen colorectal cancer tissue obtained from patients.Clinical proteomics · 2021Article
- Improvement of Gold Nanorods in Photothermal Therapy: Recent Progress and Perspective.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Network pharmacology-guided mechanism study uncovers inhibitory effect of Mahuang Decoction on lung cancer growth by impeding Akt/ERK signaling pathways.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Melanin-Like Nanomedicine in Photothermal Therapy Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Efficacy and safety of recombinant human endostatin combined with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many experts agree that personalized cancer medicine, defined here as treatment based on the molecular characteristics of a tumor from an individual patient, has great potential in the therapy of many types of cancer. Although targeted therapy agents are increasingly available for clinical applications, many of these promising drugs have produced disappointing results when tested in clinical trials, indicating that there are many challenges that must be addressed to advance this field. We propose that a new generation of clinical trials requiring biopsies to obtain relevant tumor specimens, as well as novel statistical designs, will be essential to improve treatment outcomes. However, these novel clinical trials will only be successful if appropriate biomarkers are identified to help guide the selection of the most beneficial treatments for the participating patients. Although biomarkers based on single gene mutations are the most commonly used in clinical applications today, gene-expression or protein-expression 'signatures' and new imaging technologies have the potential to play important roles as biomarkers in the future. Therefore, it is of crucial importance that we identify and resolve existing challenges that may impede the rapid identification and translation of validated biomarkers with acceptable sensitivity and specificity from the laboratory to the clinic. These challenges include limitations of current biomarker development methodologies and regulatory and reimbursement policies and practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21364686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.