ArticleNature reviews. Clinical oncology2011
WIN Consortium--challenges and advances.
Article in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Targeting PIK3CA Mutations in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2016Trial
- Worldwide Innovative Network Consortium: Building a Common Global Cancer Database.JCO global oncology · 2026Review
- A transcriptomics approach to expand therapeutic options and optimize clinical trials in oncology.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023Article
- Mouse hospital and co-clinical trial project--from bench to bedside.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2015Review
- Challenges in initiating and conducting personalized cancer therapy trials: perspectives from WINTHER, a Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) Consortium trial.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2015Article
- Pilot studies for personalized cancer medicine: focusing on the patient for treatment selection.The oncologist · 2013Article
- Molecular prescreening to select patient population in early clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012Review
- Somatic variation and cancer: therapies lost in the mix.Human genetics · 2011Review
- Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21364685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.