Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21363964›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2011

An MLL/COMPASS subunit functions in the C. elegans dosage compensation complex to target X chromosomes for transcriptional regulation of gene expression.

Rebecca R Pferdehirt, William S Kruesi, Barbara J Meyer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Combinatorial clustering of distinct DNA motifs directs synergistic binding ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. The X chromosome in C. elegans sex determination and dosage compensation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Binding of anGenetics · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nutrient-DrivenFrontiers in endocrinology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca R PferdehirtHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
William S Kruesi
Barbara J Meyer
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

POSTGRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007127 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI DILLIN, ANDREW G · 1985 to 2016
$7.9M
NEMATODE SEX DETERMINATIONR01GM030702 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI MEYER, BARBARA J · 1985 to 2018
$6.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030702NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007127NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM07127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we analyze the essential process of X-chromosome dosage compensation (DC) to elucidate mechanisms that control the assembly, genome-wide binding, and function of gene regulatory complexes that act over large chromosomal territories. We demonstrate that a subunit of Caenorhabditis elegans MLL/COMPASS, a gene activation complex, acts within the DC complex (DCC), a condensin complex, to target the DCC to both X chromosomes of hermaphrodites for chromosome-wide reduction of gene expression. The DCC binds to two categories of sites on X: rex (recruitment element on X) sites that recruit the DCC in an autonomous, sequence-dependent manner, and dox (dependent on X) sites that reside primarily in promoters of expressed genes and bind the DCC robustly only when attached to X. We find that DC mutations that abolish rex site binding greatly reduce dox site binding but do not eliminate it. Instead, binding is diminished to the low level observed at autosomal sites in wild-type animals. Changes in DCC binding to these non-rex sites occur throughout development and correlate directly with transcriptional activity of adjacent genes. Moreover, autosomal DCC binding is enhanced by rex site binding in cis in X-autosome fusion chromosomes. Thus, dox and autosomal sites have similar binding potential but are distinguished by linkage to rex sites. We propose a model for DCC binding in which low-level DCC binding at dox sites is dictated by intrinsic properties correlated with high transcriptional activity. Sex-specific DCC recruitment to rex sites then enhances the magnitude of DCC binding to dox sites in cis, which lack high affinity for the DCC on their own. We also show that the DCC balances X-chromosome gene expression between sexes by controlling transcription.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAdenosine TriphosphatasesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDosage Compensation, GeneticFemaleGenome, HelminthMaleMultiprotein ComplexesMutationNuclear ProteinsProtein BindingProtein SubunitsX ChromosomeAdenosine TriphosphatasesCaenorhabditis elegans Proteinscondensin complexesDNA-Binding Proteinsdpy-30 protein, C elegansMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID21363964
PMCPMC3049290
OpenAlexW2117917125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.