Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21362705›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal2011

Stem and progenitor cell-based therapy in ischaemic heart disease: promise, uncertainties, and challenges.

Jörn Tongers, Douglas W Losordo, Ulf Landmesser

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
32.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 248 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stem Cell Therapy in Ischemic Heart Failure.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2025
    Review
  9. Target and Cell Therapy for Atherosclerosis and CVD.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Salvianic Acid A Regulates High-Glucose-Treated Endothelial Progenitor Cell Dysfunction via the AKT/Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) Pathway.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Comparison of the Donor Age-Dependent andStem cells international · 2021
    Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jörn TongersDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Strasse 1, Hannover, Germany. tongers.joern@mh-hannover.de
Douglas W Losordo
Ulf Landmesser
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DENorthwestern University · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

Therapeutic Angiogenesis in Vascular Medicine IVR01HL053354 · NHLBI · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI KISHORE, RAJ · 1995 to 2015
$4.2M
Autologous CD34+ Cell Therapy for Therapeutic Angiogenesis in Advanced PADR01HL077428 · NHLBI · STEWARD ST. ELIZABETH'S MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOSORDO, DOUGLAS W · 2006 to 2011
$2.5M
Role of Progenitor Cells in Cardiovascular MedicineR01HL080137 · NHLBI · STEWARD ST. ELIZABETH'S MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOSORDO, DOUGLAS W · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
Novel approaches to ischemic tissue repairR01HL095874 · NHLBI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KISHORE, RAJ · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL053354NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095874NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL53354NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL77428NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL80137NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL95874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the absence of effective endogenous repair mechanisms after cardiac injury, cell-based therapies have rapidly emerged as a potential novel therapeutic approach in ischaemic heart disease. After the initial characterization of putative endothelial progenitor cells and their potential to promote cardiac neovascularization and to attenuate ischaemic injury, a decade of intense research has examined several novel approaches to promote cardiac repair in adult life. A variety of adult stem and progenitor cells from different sources have been examined for their potential to promote cardiac repair and regeneration. Although early, small-scale clinical studies underscored the potential effects of cell-based therapy largely by using bone marrow (BM)-derived cells, subsequent randomized-controlled trials have revealed mixed results that might relate, at least in part, to differences in study design and techniques, e.g. differences in patient population, cell sources and preparation, and endpoint selection. Recent meta-analyses have supported the notion that administration of BM-derived cells may improve cardiac function on top of standard therapy. At this stage, further optimization of cell-based therapy is urgently needed, and finally, large-scale clinical trials are required to eventually proof its clinical efficacy with respect to outcomes, i.e. morbidity and mortality. Despite all promises, pending uncertainties and practical limitations attenuate the therapeutic use of stem/progenitor cells for ischaemic heart disease. To advance the field forward, several important aspects need to be addressed in carefully designed studies: comparative studies may allow to discriminate superior cell populations, timing, dosing, priming of cells, and delivery mode for different applications. In order to predict benefit, influencing factors need to be identified with the aim to focus resources and efforts. Local retention and fate of cells in the therapeutic target zone must be improved. Further understanding of regenerative mechanisms will enable optimization at all levels. In this context, cell priming, bionanotechnology, and tissue engineering are emerging tools and may merge into a combined biological approach of ischaemic tissue repair.

Indexed as

AC133 AntigenAcute DiseaseAntigens, CDAntigens, CD34Chronic DiseaseEmbryonic Stem CellsForecastingGlycoproteinsHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMyoblasts, SkeletalMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial IschemiaPeptidesPluripotent Stem CellsAC133 AntigenAntigens, CDAntigens, CD34GlycoproteinsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID21362705
PMCPMC3094549
OpenAlexW2144132811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.