ArticleBMC infectious diseases2011
Timely HAART initiation may pave the way for a better viral control.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- A lower viral set point but little immunological impact after early treatment during primary HIV infection.Viral immunology · 2015Trial
- Concordance of immunological events between intrarectal and intravenous SHIVAD8-EO infection when assessed by Fiebig-equivalent staging.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021Article
- Copper/Zinc-Modified Palygorskite Protects AgainstFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Regional brain volumetric changes despite 2 years of treatment initiated during acute HIV infection.AIDS (London, England) · 2020Article
- Review of the systems biology of the immune system using agent-based models.IET systems biology · 2018Review
- A study on the dynamics of temporary HIV treatment to assess the controversial outcomes of clinical trials: An in-silico approach.PloS one · 2018Article
- Delayed differentiation of potent effector CD8Science translational medicine · 2017Article
- Kill: boosting HIV-specific immune responses.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2016Review
- Computational study to determine when to initiate and alternate therapy in HIV infection.BioMed research international · 2014Article
- A novel acute HIV infection staging system based on 4th generation immunoassay.Retrovirology · 2013Article
- FIV establishes a latent infection in feline peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocytes in vivo during the asymptomatic phase of infection.Retrovirology · 2012Article
- HIV reservoirs and immune surveillance evasion cause the failure of structured treatment interruptions: a computational study.PloS one · 2012Article
- Acute HIV Infection in Pregnancy: The Case for Third Trimester Rescreening.Case reports in infectious diseases · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhen to initiate antiretroviral therapy in HIV infected patients is a difficult clinical decision. Actually, it is still a matter of discussion whether early highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) during primary HIV infection may influence the dynamics of the viral rebound, in case of therapy interruption, and overall the main disease course.
methodsIn this article we use a computational model and clinical data to identify the role of HAART timing on the residual capability to control HIV rebound after treatment suspension. Analyses of clinical data from three groups of patients initiating HAART respectively before seroconversion (very early), during the acute phase (early) and in the chronic phase (late), evidence differences arising from the very early events of the viral infection.
resultsThe computational model allows a fine grain assessment of the impact of HAART timing on the disease outcome, from acute to chronic HIV-1 infection. Both patients' data and computer simulations reveal that HAART timing may indeed affect the HIV control capability after treatment discontinuation. In particular, we find a median time to viral rebound that is significantly longer in very early than in late patients.
conclusionsA timing threshold is identified, corresponding to approximately three weeks post-infection, after which the capability to control HIV replication is lost. Conversely, HAART initiation occurring within three weeks from the infection could allow to preserve a significant control capability. This time could be related to the global triggering of uncontrolled immune activation, affecting residual immune competence preservation and HIV reservoir establishment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.