ArticleCritical care (London, England)2011
Cytomegalovirus reactivation and associated outcome of critically ill patients with severe sepsis.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cytomegalovirus infection and outcome in immunocompetent patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Pooled it
- Corticosteroids for viral myocarditis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Viral Reactivation in Immunocompetent Critically Ill Patients.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Virus reactivation in acute and long COVID-19.Nature · 2026Article
- Histological proof of pulmonary herpesvirus presence in patients with COVID-19- or influenza-related ARDS.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Human cytomegalovirus reactivation in decompensated cirrhosis: marker of immunosuppression or contributor to severity?: Editorial on "Human cytomegalovirus reactivation in cirrhosis patients with acute decompensation".Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2026Article
- Inflammation-driven immune reprogramming in sepsis: from cytokine storm to immunoparalysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Associated Factors on Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Patients with COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Risk stratification for CMV reactivation in sepsis patients: development of an interpretable machine learning model.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Human cytomegalovirus reactivation in cirrhosis patients with acute decompensation.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Observational
- Cytomegalovirus Reactivation in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The Landscape of lower respiratory tract herpesviruses in severe pneumonia patients: a multicenter, retrospective study with prospective validation.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Risk Factors for Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Its Impact on Clinical Outcomes in Immunocompetent Seropositive Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025Article
- Detection of cytomegalovirus in the lower respiratory tract among patients with critical illness: uncovering enhanced potential benefits.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cytomegalovirus reactivation in the lower respiratory tract as an independent risk factor for mortality in critically Ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Viral reactivations and fungal infections in nonresolving acute respiratory distress syndrome.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Active cytomegalovirus infection in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Chronic Viral Reactivation and Associated Host Immune Response and Clinical Outcomes in Acute COVID-19 and Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSepsis has been identified as a risk factor for human cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in critically ill patients. However, the contribution of CMV reactivation on morbidity and mortality is still controversial. Therefore, we analyzed the incidence and impact of CMV reactivation on outcome in patients with severe sepsis.
methodsIn a prospective longitudinal double-blinded observational study, 97 adult nonimmunosuppressed CMV-seropositive patients with new onset of severe sepsis were included. Leukocytes, plasma and tracheal secretions were examined weekly for CMV-DNA by PCR. Tracheal secretions were additionally tested for HSV (Herpes Simplex Virus)-DNA. The influence of CMV-reactivation on the endpoints was analysed by Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis. Time-dependency was evaluated by landmark analysis.
resultsSix out 97 died and five were discharged from the hospital within 72 hours and were excluded of the analysis. CMV reactivation occurred in 35 of the 86 (40.69%) analysed patients. HSV infection occurred in 23 of the 35 (65.7%) CMV reactivators. In 10 patients CMV-plasma-DNAemia appeared with a DNA-content below 600 copies/ml in four cases and a peak amount of 2,830 copies/ml on average. In patients with and without CMV reactivation mortality rates were similar (37.1% vs. 35.3%, P = 0.861), respectively. However, in the multivariate COX regression analyses CMV reactivation was independently associated with increased length of stay in the ICU (30.0, interquartile range 14 to 48 vs. 12.0, interquartile range 7 to 19 days; HR (hazard ratio) 3.365; 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.233 to 9.183, P = 0.018) and in the hospital (33.0, interquartile range 24 to 62 vs. 16.0, interquartile range 10 to 24 days, HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.78 to 6.25, P < 0.001) as well as prolonged mechanical ventilation (22.0, interquartile range 6 to 36 vs. 7.5, interquartile range 5 to 15.5 days; HR 2.6,CI 95% 1.39 to 4.94; P < 0.001) and impaired pulmonary gas exchange (six days, interquartile range 1 to 17, vs. three, interquartile range 1 to 7, days in reactivators vs. non-reactivators, P = 0.038). HSV reactivation proved not to be a risk factor for these adverse effects.
conclusionsThese data indicate an independent correlation between CMV reactivation and increased morbidity in the well-defined group of nonimmunosuppressed patients with severe sepsis, but CMV reactivation had no impact on mortality in this group with low CMV-DNA plasma levels. Thus, the potential harms and benefits of antiviral treatment have to be weighed cautiously in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.