Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21362080›Full record

ReviewWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment.

Gregory S Schultz, Jeffrey M Davidson, Robert S Kirsner, Paul Bornstein, Ira M Herman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 214 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
33.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 473 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. FUT11 as a potential biomarker of clear cell renal cell carcinoma progression based on meta-analysis of gene expression data.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory S SchultzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jeffrey M Davidson
Robert S Kirsner
Paul Bornstein
Ira M Herman
Center for Innovation · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Washington · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

REGULATION OF STROMAL WOUND HEALING BY GROWTH FACTORSR01EY005587 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI SCHULTZ, GREGORY SCOTT · 1985 to 2014
$4.1M
Skin Regeneration with Stem Cells and ScaffoldsR01AR056138 · NIAMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, JEFFREY M., GUELCHER, SCOTT A · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
ELASTIN AND COLLAGEN IN THE AGING PROCESSR01AG006528 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, JEFFREY M. · 1986 to 2011
$2.9M
Vision Research CoreP30EY021721 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HAUSWIRTH, WILLIAM W · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
CARP: Angiogenic Gene Therapy in Diabetic WoundsR01DK065656 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, JEFFREY M. · 2003 to 2011
$2.3M
Regulating retinal microvascular morphogenesisR01EY015125 · NEI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI HERMAN, IRA M · 2004 to 2010
$1.7M
A new approach to the treatment of Retinopathy of PrematurityK08EY019533 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI YATES, PAUL A. · 2009 to 2013
$959k
Pericytes, pathological angiogenesis and diabetic retinopathyR21EY019553 · NEI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI HERMAN, IRA M · 2009 to 2010
$452k
NEI NIH HHS EY05587NEI NIH HHS EY15125NEI NIH HHS EY19533NEI NIH HHS K08 EY019533NEI NIH HHS P30 EY021721NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005587NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015125NEI NIH HHS R21 EY019553NIAMS NIH HHS AR056138NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056138NIA NIH HHS AG06528NIA NIH HHS R01 AG006528NIDDK NIH HHS DK065656NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK065656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here, we define dynamic reciprocity (DR) as an ongoing, bidirectional interaction among cells and their surrounding microenvironment. In this review, we posit that DR is especially meaningful during wound healing as the DR-driven biochemical, biophysical, and cellular responses to injury play pivotal roles in regulating tissue regenerative responses. Such cell-extracellular matrix interactions not only guide and regulate cellular morphology, but also cellular differentiation, migration, proliferation, and survival during tissue development, including, e.g., embryogenesis, angiogenesis, as well as during pathologic processes including cancer, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic wound healing. Herein, we examine DR within the wound microenvironment while considering specific examples across acute and chronic wound healing. This review also considers how a number of hypotheses that attempt to explain chronic wound pathophysiology may be understood within the DR framework. The implications of applying the principles of DR to optimize wound care practice and future development of innovative wound healing therapeutics are also briefly considered.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiofilmsCell CommunicationCell MovementCell ProliferationChronic DiseaseDiabetic FootExtracellular MatrixHemostasisHumansInflammationIntegrinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMatrix MetalloproteinasesRegenerationVaricose UlcerIntegrinsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMatrix Metalloproteinases

Identifiers

PMID21362080
PMCPMC3051353
OpenAlexW1573296762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.