SynthesisThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2011
Probing the independence of formant control using altered auditory feedback.
Synthesis in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Sensory basis of speech motor learning and memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Neural mechanisms of articulatory motor speech deficit in post-stroke aphasia: An ERP study.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- The Effects of Theta-Gamma Peak Stimulation on Sensorimotor Learning During Speech Production.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Speech-evoked cortical activities and speech recognition in adult cochlear implant listeners: a review of functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies.Experimental brain research · 2024Review
- Discrimination and sensorimotor adaptation of self-produced vowels in cochlear implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- On the interplay between speech perception and production: insights from research and theories.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Speech sensorimotor relationships in francophone preschoolers and adults: Adaptation to real-time auditory feedback perturbations.PloS one · 2024Article
- Using altered auditory feedback to study pitch compensation and adaptation in tonal language speakers.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Review
- Do Not Cut Off Your Tail: A Mega-Analysis of Responses to Auditory Perturbation Experiments.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- How the conception of control influences our understanding of actions.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023Review
- Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Temporal malleability to auditory feedback perturbation is modulated by rhythmic abilities and auditory acuity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Inter-Trial Formant Variability in Speech Production Is Actively Controlled but Does Not Affect Subsequent Adaptation to a Predictable Formant Perturbation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Disruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021Article
- Auditory Feedback Is Used for Adaptation and Compensation in Speech Timing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Unconscious and Distinctive Control of Vocal Pitch and Timbre During Altered Auditory Feedback.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- What drives the perceptual change resulting from speech motor adaptation? Evaluation of hypotheses in a Bayesian modeling framework.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two auditory feedback perturbation experiments were conducted to examine the nature of control of the first two formants in vowels. In the first experiment, talkers heard their auditory feedback with either F1 or F2 shifted in frequency. Talkers altered production of the perturbed formant by changing its frequency in the opposite direction to the perturbation but did not produce a correlated alteration of the unperturbed formant. Thus, the motor control system is capable of fine-grained independent control of F1 and F2. In the second experiment, a large meta-analysis was conducted on data from talkers who received feedback where both F1 and F2 had been perturbed. A moderate correlation was found between individual compensations in F1 and F2 suggesting that the control of F1 and F2 is processed in a common manner at some level. While a wide range of individual compensation magnitudes were observed, no significant correlations were found between individuals' compensations and vowel space differences. Similarly, no significant correlations were found between individuals' compensations and variability in normal vowel production. Further, when receiving normal auditory feedback, most of the population exhibited no significant correlation between the natural variation in production of F1 and F2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.