Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21361335›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2011

Direct analysis of methylated trivalent arsenicals in mouse liver by hydride generation-cryotrapping-atomic absorption spectrometry.

Jenna M Currier, Milan Svoboda, Diogo P de Moraes, Tomás Matousek, Jirí Dĕdina, Miroslav Stýblo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Arsenic Metabolism in Mice Carrying aEnvironmental health perspectives · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Jenna M CurrierCurriculum in Toxicology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Milan Svoboda
Diogo P de Moraes
Tomás Matousek
Jirí Dĕdina
Miroslav Stýblo
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Analytical Chemistry · CZUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCharles University · CZ

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
TOXICOLOGYT32ES007126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ILONA JASPERS, Bernard E. Weissman · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence suggest that the methylated trivalent metabolites of inorganic arsenic (iAs), methylarsonite (MAs(III)) and dimethylarsinite (DMAs(III)), contribute to adverse effects of iAs exposure. However, the lack of suitable methods has hindered the quantitative analysis of MAs(III) and DMAs(III) in complex biological matrices. Here, we show that hydride generation-cryotrapping-atomic absorption spectrometry can quantify both MAs(III) and DMAs(III) in livers of mice exposed to iAs. No sample extraction is required, thus limiting MAs(III) or DMAs(III) oxidation prior to analysis. The limits of detection are below 6 ng As/g of tissue, making this method suitable even for studies examining low exposures to iAs.

Indexed as

AnimalsArsenicCacodylic AcidLiverMethylationMiceOxidation-ReductionSpectrophotometry, AtomicWater Pollutants, ChemicalArsenicCacodylic Aciddimethylarsinous acidmethylarsoniteWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID21361335
PMCPMC4154318
OpenAlexW1994924349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.