Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21361197›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2011

Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system.

Michael T Tomkowiak, Michael A Speidel, Amish N Raval, Michael S Van Lysel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. X-ray and optical stereo-based 3D sensor fusion system for image-guided neurosurgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inverse geometry x-ray imaging: application in interventional procedures.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael T TomkowiakDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
Michael A Speidel
Amish N Raval
Michael S Van Lysel
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Low-Dose Tomosynthetic Interventional System For Quantitative Cardiac ImagingR01HL084022 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SPEIDEL, MICHAEL A · 2007 to 2015
$4.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL084022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantitative coronary angiography (QCA) can be used to support device size selection for cardiovascular interventions. The accuracy of QCA measurements using conventional x-ray fluoroscopy depends on proper calibration using a reference object and avoiding vessel foreshortening. The authors have developed a novel interventional device sizing method using the inverse geometry scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) fluoroscopy system. The proposed method can measure the diameter and length of vessel segments without imaging a reference object and when vessels appear foreshortened.

methodsSBDX creates multiple tomosynthetic x-ray images corresponding to planes through the patient volume. The structures that lie in the plane are in focus and the features above and below the plane are blurred. Three-dimensional localization of the vessel edges was performed by examining the degree of blurring at each image plane. A 3D vessel centerline was created and used to determine vessel magnification and angulation relative to the image planes. Diameter measurements were performed using a model-based method and length measurements were calculated from the 3D centerline. Phantom validation was performed by measuring the diameter and length of vessel segments with nominal diameters ranging from 0.5 to 2.8 mm and nominal lengths of 42 mm. The phantoms were imaged at a range of positions between the source and the detector (+/- 16 cm relative to isocenter) and with a range of foreshortening angles (0 degrees-75 degrees).

resultsChanges in vessel phantom position created magnifications ranging from 87% to 118% relative to isocenter magnification. Average diameter errors were less than 0.15 mm. Average length measurements were within 1% (0.3 mm) of the true length. No trends were observed between measurement accuracy and magnification. Changes in vessel phantom orientation resulted in decreased apparent length down to 28% of the original nonforeshortened length. Average diameter errors were less than 0.25 mm across all vessel angulations; errors were less than 0.1 mm for smaller diameter vessels and low to moderate vessel angles. Diameter errors increased with true diameter and vessel angle relative to the image plane. Average length measurement errors were also within 1% (0.3 mm) for each angulation.

conclusionsTomosynthetic imaging with SBDX can accurately measure dimensions of vessels in various magnifications and angulations without calibration. This method may be more accurate and convenient than conventional QCA techniques.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCoronary AngiographyFeasibility StudiesFluoroscopyImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID21361197
PMCPMC3021558
OpenAlexW2084182660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.