ArticleMedical physics2011
Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system.
Article in Medical physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Coronary Angiography Guidance for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Clinical expert consensus document on quantitative coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2020Article
- X-ray and optical stereo-based 3D sensor fusion system for image-guided neurosurgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016Article
- Real-time out-of-plane artifact subtraction tomosynthesis imaging using prior CT for scanning beam digital x-ray system.Medical physics · 2014Article
- Calibration-free coronary artery measurements for interventional device sizing using inverse geometry x-ray fluoroscopy:Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2014Article
- Calibration-Free Coronary Artery Measurements for Interventional Device Sizing using Inverse Geometry X-ray Fluoroscopy:Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2014Article
- Inverse geometry x-ray imaging: application in interventional procedures.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantitative coronary angiography (QCA) can be used to support device size selection for cardiovascular interventions. The accuracy of QCA measurements using conventional x-ray fluoroscopy depends on proper calibration using a reference object and avoiding vessel foreshortening. The authors have developed a novel interventional device sizing method using the inverse geometry scanning-beam digital x-ray (SBDX) fluoroscopy system. The proposed method can measure the diameter and length of vessel segments without imaging a reference object and when vessels appear foreshortened.
methodsSBDX creates multiple tomosynthetic x-ray images corresponding to planes through the patient volume. The structures that lie in the plane are in focus and the features above and below the plane are blurred. Three-dimensional localization of the vessel edges was performed by examining the degree of blurring at each image plane. A 3D vessel centerline was created and used to determine vessel magnification and angulation relative to the image planes. Diameter measurements were performed using a model-based method and length measurements were calculated from the 3D centerline. Phantom validation was performed by measuring the diameter and length of vessel segments with nominal diameters ranging from 0.5 to 2.8 mm and nominal lengths of 42 mm. The phantoms were imaged at a range of positions between the source and the detector (+/- 16 cm relative to isocenter) and with a range of foreshortening angles (0 degrees-75 degrees).
resultsChanges in vessel phantom position created magnifications ranging from 87% to 118% relative to isocenter magnification. Average diameter errors were less than 0.15 mm. Average length measurements were within 1% (0.3 mm) of the true length. No trends were observed between measurement accuracy and magnification. Changes in vessel phantom orientation resulted in decreased apparent length down to 28% of the original nonforeshortened length. Average diameter errors were less than 0.25 mm across all vessel angulations; errors were less than 0.1 mm for smaller diameter vessels and low to moderate vessel angles. Diameter errors increased with true diameter and vessel angle relative to the image plane. Average length measurement errors were also within 1% (0.3 mm) for each angulation.
conclusionsTomosynthetic imaging with SBDX can accurately measure dimensions of vessels in various magnifications and angulations without calibration. This method may be more accurate and convenient than conventional QCA techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.