GuidelinePathologica2010
Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death.
Guideline in Pathologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of sudden cardiac death from human blood using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and machine learning.International journal of legal medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac left ventricular myocardial tissue density, evaluated by computed tomography and autopsy.BMC medical imaging · 2019Article
- Postmortem cardiac magnetic resonance in sudden cardiac death.Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Molecular genetic diagnostics for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death syndromes.Herz · 2017Review
- The association between pro-arrhythmic agents and aortic stenosis in young adults: is it sufficient to clarify the sudden unexpected deaths?Cardiology in the young · 2017Article
- Postmortem genetic screening for the identification, verification, and reporting of genetic variants contributing to the sudden death of the young.Genome research · 2016Article
- A Clinical Perspective on Sudden Cardiac Death.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2016Article
- Fibrosis, Connexin-43, and Conduction Abnormalities in the Brugada Syndrome.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Reprint of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although sudden cardiac death is one of the most important mode of death in Western Countries, pathologists and public health physicians have not given this problem the attention it deserves. New methods of preventing potentially fatal arrhythmias have been developed and the accurate diagnosis of the causes of sudden cardiac death is now of particular importance. Pathologists are responsible for determining the precise cause of sudden death but there is considerable variation in the way in which they approach this increasingly complex task. The Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology developed these Guidelines, which represent the minimum standard that is required in the routine autopsy practice for the adequate assessment of sudden cardiac death, including not only a protocol for heart examination and histological sampling, but also for toxicology and molecular investigation. Our recommendations apply to University Medical Centres, Regional and District Hospitals and all types of Forensic Medicine Institutes. If a uniform method of investigation is adopted throughout the European Union, this will lead to improvements in standards of practice, allow meaningful comparisons between different communities and regions and, most importantly, permit future trends in the patterns of disease causing sudden death to be monitored.
Identifiers
21361120What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.