ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2011
Anatomical, blood oxygenation level-dependent, and blood flow MRI of nonhuman primate (baboon) retina.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Promising Glaucoma Medication: A Comprehensive Translational Evaluation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- 3T high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, conventional ultrasonography and ultrasound biomicroscopy of the normal canine eye.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Application of Arterial Spin Labelling in the Assessment of Ocular Tissues.BioMed research international · 2016Review
- Choroidal blood flow decreases with age: an MRI study.Current eye research · 2014Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the retina: from mice to men.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2014Review
- Lamina-specific anatomic magnetic resonance imaging of the human retina.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2011Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the retina: A brief historical and future perspective.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this study was to demonstrate high-resolution anatomical, blood oxygenation level-dependent, and blood flow MRI on large nonhuman primate retinas using a 3-Tesla clinical scanner as a first step toward translation. Baboon was chosen because of its evolutionary similarity to human. Anesthetized preparation, free of eye-movement artifacts, was used to evaluate clinical scanner hardware feasibility and optimize multimodal protocols for retinal MRI. Anatomical MRI (0.1×0.2×2.0 mm3) before contrast-agent injection detected three alternating bright-dark-bright layers. The hyperintense inner strip nearest to the vitreous was enhanced by an intravascular contrast agent, which likely included the ganglion and bipolar cell layer and the embedded retinal vessels. The hypointense middle strip showed no contrast enhancement, which likely included the avascular outer unclear layer and photoreceptor segments. The hyperintense outer strip showed contrast enhancement, which likely corresponded to the choroid vascular layer. In the posterior retina, the total thickness including the choroid was 617±101 μm (±standard deviation, n=7). Blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI (0.3×0.6×2.0 mm3) of oxygen inhalation relative to air increased the signals by 6.5±1.4%. Basal blood flow (2×2×2 mm3) was 83±30 mL/100 g/min (air), and hypercapnia increased blood flow by 25±9% (P<0.05). This study demonstrates multimodal MRI to image anatomy, physiology, and function on large nonhuman primate retinas using a clinical scanner, offering encouraging data to explore human applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.