Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21360207›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2011

Repair of parastomal hernias with biologic grafts: a systematic review.

Nicholas Jonathan Slater, Bibi M E Hansson, Otmar R Buyne, Thijs Hendriks, Robert P Bleichrodt

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Principles and parallels of prevention and repair of parastomal hernia with meshes].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Stoma Complications.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2017
    Review
  17. Parastomal Hernia: Avoidance and Treatment in the 21st Century.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Article
  18. Strangulated ileostomy evisceration following lateralizing mesh repair of parastomal hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas Jonathan SlaterDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. n.slater@chir.umcn.nl
Bibi M E Hansson
Otmar R Buyne
Thijs Hendriks
Robert P Bleichrodt

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiologic grafts are increasingly used instead of synthetic mesh for parastomal hernia repair due to concerns of synthetic mesh-related complications. This systematic review was designed to evaluate the use of these collagen-based scaffolds for the repair of parastomal hernias.

methodsStudies were retrieved after searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL. The search terms 'paracolostomy', 'paraileostomy', 'parastomal', 'colostomy', 'ileostomy', 'hernia', 'defect', 'closure', 'repair' and 'reconstruction' were used. Selection of studies and assessment of methodological quality were performed with a modified MINORS index. All reports on repair of parastomal hernias using a collagen-based biologic scaffold to reinforce or bridge the defect were included. Outcomes were recurrence rate, mortality and morbidity.

resultsFour retrospective studies with a combined enrolment of 57 patients were included. Recurrence occurred in 15.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-25.9) of patients and wound-related complications in 26.2% (95% CI 14.7-39.5). No mortality or graft infections were reported.

conclusionsThe use of reinforcing or bridging biologic grafts during parastomal hernia repair results in acceptable rates of recurrence and complications. However, given the similar rates of recurrence and complications achieved using synthetic mesh in this scenario, the evidence does not support use of biologic grafts.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsHernia, AbdominalHumansLaparoscopyPlastic Surgery ProceduresSurgical StomasTransplantation, HeterologousTransplantation, HomologousTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21360207
PMCPMC3116129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.