Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21360098›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2011

Clozapine increases reward evaluation but not overall ingestive behaviour in rats licking for sucrose.

Adriana Galistu, Cristina Modde, Maria Cristina Pireddu, Flavia Franconi, Gino Serra, Paolo S D'Aquila

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Role of dopamine DPsychopharmacology · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Involvement of Endogenous Enkephalins and β-Endorphin in Feeding and Diet-Induced Obesity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adriana GalistuDipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università di Sassari, Via Muroni 23/A, Sassari, Italy.
Cristina Modde
Maria Cristina Pireddu
Flavia Franconi
Gino Serra
Paolo S D'Aquila

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleClozapine and the "atypical" antipsychotics are less prone than neuroleptics to induce extrapyramidal motor effects, worsening of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and dysphoria. This is paralleled by preclinical evidence showing reduced suppression of behaviours aimed at the pursuit of reward, with increased measures of reward efficacy. Serotonin 5-HT2 receptors seem to play a role in determining this profile.

objectiveWe investigated the effects of clozapine on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour, which might reveal behavioural dimensions, such as reward evaluation and behavioural activation, which might be relevant in explaining its atypical profile. Moreover, we investigated the possibility that coadministration of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol and the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ritanserin might mimic clozapine effects. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe effects of clozapine (0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg) and of the coadministration of haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg) and ritanserin (0.5 and 3 mg/kg) have been examined on the microstructure of licking for a 10% sucrose solution in rats.

resultsClozapine failed to affect whole ingestion as revealed by the lack of effect on lick number. However, it increased reward evaluation at the dose of 1 mg/kg, as revealed by increased mean bout size. Haloperidol resulted in a decreased bout size. Ritanserin failed to exert any effects either alone or when coadministered with haloperidol.

conclusionThe ability of clozapine to increase reward evaluation might contribute to explain its atypical profile both in the clinical setting and in preclinical studies. These results suggest that 5-HT2A/2C receptors are not involved in the observed effect.

Indexed as

RewardAnhedoniaAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBehavior, AnimalClozapineData Interpretation, StatisticalDopamine AntagonistsFeeding BehaviorHaloperidolMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2CRitanserinAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineDopamine AntagonistsHaloperidolReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2AReceptor, Serotonin, 5-HT2CRitanserinSerotonin AntagonistsSucrose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.