ArticlePsychopharmacology2011
Clozapine increases reward evaluation but not overall ingestive behaviour in rats licking for sucrose.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dopamine, activation of ingestion and evaluation of response efficacy: a focus on the within-session time-course of licking burst number.Psychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Further characterization of the effect of the prototypical antidepressant imipramine on the microstructure of licking for sucrose.PloS one · 2021Article
- Clozapine reliably increases the motivation for food: parsing the role of the 5-HTPsychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Antidepressant Drugs Correct the Imbalance Between proBDNF/p75NTR/Sortilin and Mature BDNF/TrkB in the Brain of Mice with Chronic Stress.Neurotoxicity research · 2020Article
- Role of dopamine DPsychopharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
- Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Within-session decrement of the emission of licking bursts following reward devaluation in rats licking for sucrose.PloS one · 2017Article
- Atypical antipsychotics and effects on feeding: from mice to men.Psychopharmacology · 2016Review
- Involvement of Endogenous Enkephalins and β-Endorphin in Feeding and Diet-Induced Obesity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015Article
- Dopamine on D2-like receptors "reboosts" dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for a isotonic NaCl solution.Psychopharmacology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleClozapine and the "atypical" antipsychotics are less prone than neuroleptics to induce extrapyramidal motor effects, worsening of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia and dysphoria. This is paralleled by preclinical evidence showing reduced suppression of behaviours aimed at the pursuit of reward, with increased measures of reward efficacy. Serotonin 5-HT2 receptors seem to play a role in determining this profile.
objectiveWe investigated the effects of clozapine on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour, which might reveal behavioural dimensions, such as reward evaluation and behavioural activation, which might be relevant in explaining its atypical profile. Moreover, we investigated the possibility that coadministration of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol and the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist ritanserin might mimic clozapine effects. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe effects of clozapine (0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg) and of the coadministration of haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg) and ritanserin (0.5 and 3 mg/kg) have been examined on the microstructure of licking for a 10% sucrose solution in rats.
resultsClozapine failed to affect whole ingestion as revealed by the lack of effect on lick number. However, it increased reward evaluation at the dose of 1 mg/kg, as revealed by increased mean bout size. Haloperidol resulted in a decreased bout size. Ritanserin failed to exert any effects either alone or when coadministered with haloperidol.
conclusionThe ability of clozapine to increase reward evaluation might contribute to explain its atypical profile both in the clinical setting and in preclinical studies. These results suggest that 5-HT2A/2C receptors are not involved in the observed effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21360098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.