ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2011
Chronic myelogenous leukemia: monitoring response to therapy.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and optimization of parameters for accurate quantification of RNA by RT-dPCR.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- A certified plasmid reference material for the standardisation of BCR-ABL1 mRNA quantification by real-time quantitative PCR.Leukemia · 2015Article
- Molecular response to imatinib in chronic myeloid leukaemia with a variant e13a3 BCR-ABL1 fusion.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular monitoring is a key component of the management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. The current recommendation is that molecular monitoring be performed in place of cytogenetic assessment when a major molecular response (MMR) is achieved. With the more potent kinase inhibitors nilotinib and dasatinib now approved as front-line therapy, more patients will achieve an MMR and will benefit from molecular monitoring. There is a strong correlation between certain BCR-ABL1 levels and the cytogenetic response, which means that molecular monitoring may act as a surrogate for cytogenetic response, but only if the BCR-ABL1 values are converted to the international reporting scale. Furthermore, improvements in the limit of BCR-ABL1 detection and reduction of intra-assay variability are ongoing issues of importance for molecular monitoring. Standardization of molecular methods to accurately assess the patient response also remains a challenge, despite the recent certification of international scale reference materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.